Dyskusja wikipedysty:Ak.delticom: Różnice pomiędzy wersjami

Treść strony nie jest dostępna w innych językach.
Z Wikipedii, wolnej encyklopedii
Usunięta treść Dodana treść
explanation of the problem
Linia 10: Linia 10:
I think it is better if everyone knows i am affiliated with a company - but the article written here is a translation done by an professional agency of the german article. The german article features a neutral tone and was published and approved on Wikipedia DE quite some time ago.
I think it is better if everyone knows i am affiliated with a company - but the article written here is a translation done by an professional agency of the german article. The german article features a neutral tone and was published and approved on Wikipedia DE quite some time ago.
I hope i can keep my account, i want to contribute i an unbiased manner.| [[Wikipedysta:Ak.delticom|Ak.delticom]] ([[Dyskusja wikipedysty:Ak.delticom|dyskusja]]) 12:12, 18 sie 2014 (CEST)
I hope i can keep my account, i want to contribute i an unbiased manner.| [[Wikipedysta:Ak.delticom|Ak.delticom]] ([[Dyskusja wikipedysty:Ak.delticom|dyskusja]]) 12:12, 18 sie 2014 (CEST)

Hello Artur Klosek.

The problem lies within the Polish Wikipedia rules. Namely, we have a [[Wikipedia:Nazwa użytkownika|local requirement]] that users' nicks must not contain company names, trademarks, internet sites addresses, etc. This rule dates far prior to the recent Wikimedia Foundations's [[:meta:Terms of use/Paid contributions amendment|regulations]], according to which people paid for contributing must disclose their employers. While these two rules are not blatanlty inconsistent, their co-existence is pretty problematic, as shown by, for example, the case of your nick.

Our community is currently [[Wikipedia:Kawiarenka/Zasady#Meta-ustalenia a nasza praktyka - czy nie trzeba czegoś zmienić?|discussing]] this topic. As a result of this dispute, our local regulations may be updated; this is, however, not certain, since there is a number of quite conservative users here. Still, no one's going to ban you at the moment - at the very least, for the duration of the dispute.

Kind regards, <small style="border:1px solid blue;position:relative;left:1px;">[[User:Marcgal|<span style="color:blue;">Marcgal</span>]]</small><small style="border:1px solid blue;">[[User talk:Marcgal|<span style="color:blue;">respons</span>]]</small> 21:59, 20 sie 2014 (CEST)

Wersja z 21:59, 20 sie 2014

Nazwa

Witaj. Zgodnie z zasadami Wikipedii, nazwa użytkownika nie może być nazwą firmy, adresem ani inną formą reklamy. Zobacz wyjaśnienia.

Proszę o złożenie wniosku o zmianę nazwy TUTAJ, w przeciwnym wypadku konto zostanie zablokowane. Ciacho5 (dyskusja) 11:55, 18 sie 2014 (CEST)[odpowiedz]

__

Hello, My Name is Artur Klosek and i work at Delticom. ak are my Initals. I created the account in Germany, where it was veryfied by the wikipedia administrators. I think it is better if everyone knows i am affiliated with a company - but the article written here is a translation done by an professional agency of the german article. The german article features a neutral tone and was published and approved on Wikipedia DE quite some time ago. I hope i can keep my account, i want to contribute i an unbiased manner.| Ak.delticom (dyskusja) 12:12, 18 sie 2014 (CEST)[odpowiedz]

Hello Artur Klosek.

The problem lies within the Polish Wikipedia rules. Namely, we have a local requirement that users' nicks must not contain company names, trademarks, internet sites addresses, etc. This rule dates far prior to the recent Wikimedia Foundations's regulations, according to which people paid for contributing must disclose their employers. While these two rules are not blatanlty inconsistent, their co-existence is pretty problematic, as shown by, for example, the case of your nick.

Our community is currently discussing this topic. As a result of this dispute, our local regulations may be updated; this is, however, not certain, since there is a number of quite conservative users here. Still, no one's going to ban you at the moment - at the very least, for the duration of the dispute.

Kind regards, Marcgalrespons 21:59, 20 sie 2014 (CEST)[odpowiedz]