Dyskusja wikipedystki:Whatamidoing (WMF)
Hi, we try to keep the meta and content namespaces as cleanly separated as possible, so I moved that to {{Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Nawigacja}}. Matma Rex dyskusja 23:18, 10 lip 2013 (CEST)
- Actually, there's a lof of redlinks there – are you intending to import all that from mw.org? Why? Matma Rex dyskusja 23:19, 10 lip 2013 (CEST)
- Thank you for moving it to a sensible place and name. I need to go get the Polish titles from Mediawiki; it's being translated right now.
- Several of the pages are being translated. I'm not sure that all of them will be (probably not the page about translation, for example). But none of them have been finished except the FAQ, so none of them have been moved over here. Whatamidoing (WMF) (dyskusja) 23:24, 10 lip 2013 (CEST)
- Also, it's a custom at pl.wp to reply at the talk page of the other person (or on both talk pages). Just letting you know to avoid any future misunderstandings :) Matma Rex dyskusja 00:44, 11 lip 2013 (CEST)
- They look okay at a glance. Frankly, our project and help namespaces are not as well-separated as they could be; worse case, someone will move the pages later. :) Matma Rex dyskusja 19:26, 11 lip 2013 (CEST)
- Also, it's a custom at pl.wp to reply at the talk page of the other person (or on both talk pages). Just letting you know to avoid any future misunderstandings :) Matma Rex dyskusja 00:44, 11 lip 2013 (CEST)
Odp:Banner
[edytuj kod]Yes, of course, for a few hours. Tar Lócesilion|queta! 20:13, 16 lip 2013 (CEST)
- If I reason correctly, maybe instead of supplementing, we should change the central info 'VisualEditor will soon be available for all users' with 'VisualEditor will soon be available for all users of [N] Wikipedia'? It'll be precise and as a result, we'll avoid the duplication (cross-bannering? :) which would apply to a great part of users (who use the language matching the content language of the wiki) if we launched both Central and Site. Locally the info might be added to a site like Watchlist-details or MediaWiki:Watchlist-summary, too. On the pl, in the second one, there's a template used as a summary of goings-on. Tar Lócesilion|queta! 23:53, 16 lip 2013 (CEST)
- That's a surprise... Is there any perfect solution possible? ;) Tar Lócesilion|queta! 19:54, 18 lip 2013 (CEST)
- Nor do I, it was a friendly irony ;)
- For me, Szablon:Państwo/opis works perfectly. There are the parameters and the descriptions. If it appears to be a problem for more users, Matma Rex will know, what to do ;) Tar Lócesilion|queta! 20:31, 18 lip 2013 (CEST)
- That's a surprise... Is there any perfect solution possible? ;) Tar Lócesilion|queta! 19:54, 18 lip 2013 (CEST)
Wikipedia:Kawiarenka/Ogólne#Does_the_community_of_pl-wiki_have_problems_with_the_visual_editor.3F
[edytuj kod]Regarding your entry Wikipedia:Kawiarenka/Ogólne#Does the community of pl-wiki have problems with the visual editor? - before you comment about "happines of Polish wikipedians about VE" please ask around and read this thread (if you don't understand Polish, have somebody to read it to you). To help, I'll give you a short summary: "why the WMF is forcing this bug-ridden frog down our throats? Why doesn't it work with many templates? How to switch it off?" with the conclusion given by one of the most pro-VE WIkipedians: "this frog is tasty in small bits (easy edits) but unpalatable in larger quantities (i.e. more complicated edits)". So please refrain from posting about happiness of Polish wikipedians, before becoming one. Regards--Felis domestica (dyskusja) 01:32, 20 lip 2013 (CEST)
Odp:WMF intends for Only VisualEditor to be usable on Talk pages; representative states he would "dearly love to kill off Wikitext".
[edytuj kod]- Odp:WMF intends for Only VisualEditor to be usable on Talk pages; representative states he would "dearly love to kill off Wikitext".
- Hello! Because there is a kind of panic and nobody knows what will happen, although you placed the information, I have informed on our notice board, that after VisualEditor will be implemented, there will be still two ways to edit: the old way (edit source) and the new way (edit). I hope we all will be able to sleep quietly now:-) I also invited wikipedians to try out VisualEditor. My question is: how long will we be able to use the two options to edit? In the future, to avoid such unnecessary, unpleasant situations, please inform us on our notice board (Ogłoszenia) in English or contact somebody from pl-wp in person; you can also contact me (in Queen's simple English). It would be a good idea, if there was a contact person between each wikipedia and WMF, to inform on time about changes and so on. Just to improve the communication and avoid misunderstandings. Greetings. Hortensja (dyskusja) 23:16, 21 lip 2013 (CEST)
Thank you for your effort to clarify everything! --Marcgalrespons 20:22, 22 lip 2013 (CEST)
Template
[edytuj kod]1, and I want dissable VE on my account:) Farary (dyskusja) 19:19, 24 lip 2013 (CEST)
Re:Table of contents
[edytuj kod]Hello! I added the numbers to the section headings myself. Hector Augustus (dyskusja) 21:51, 26 lip 2013 (CEST)
Ad. API change will break your bot
[edytuj kod]Hi,
OK. Thanks for the info. I have fixed my bot to https:// protocol.
Regards Electron ツ ➧☎ 00:43, 26 cze 2016 (CEST)
Odp:New Beta Feature next week
[edytuj kod]Hi! I meant the top toolbar, but CharInsert seems to do the job as well (never used it, though). PG (dyskusja) 19:17, 14 paź 2020 (CEST)
- Thanks for the quick reply, @PG. That's been requested at phab:T249072. I don't know when they'll get it done. Whatamidoing (WMF) (dyskusja) 22:33, 14 paź 2020 (CEST)
Problem with reply tool
[edytuj kod]I know that the Polish Wikipedia would like the Reply tool turned on for everyone, especially newcomers, but I think this test is important. Skąd to wiadomo? — (Wypowiedź jest moją opinią, chyba że zaznaczono inaczej; proszę o brak tzw. pingów). — Paelius (dyskusja) 16:20, 15 gru 2020 (CET)
- There have been previous discussions about this. Whatamidoing (WMF) (dyskusja) 21:19, 15 gru 2020 (CET)
- Te dyskusje nie znaczą, że jest to jednogłośne zdanie wszystkich wolontariuszy polskiej wikipedii — (Wypowiedź jest moją opinią, chyba że zaznaczono inaczej; proszę o brak tzw. pingów). — Paelius (dyskusja) 12:51, 16 gru 2020 (CET)
- True. In English, "everyone" is not identical to "unanimous". If a teenager says "everyone is going to be there", his parents do not expect the entire population of the earth, or even all of his friends to be there. Perhaps Polish is different? Whatamidoing (WMF) (dyskusja) 19:09, 16 gru 2020 (CET)
- Drugie zdanie ("everyone is going to be there") wprowadza w błąd, tak jak twój zapis I know that the Polish Wikipedia would like i jako taki jest niedopuszczalny — (Wypowiedź jest moją opinią, chyba że zaznaczono inaczej; proszę o brak tzw. pingów). — Paelius (dyskusja) 21:02, 17 gru 2020 (CET)
- True. In English, "everyone" is not identical to "unanimous". If a teenager says "everyone is going to be there", his parents do not expect the entire population of the earth, or even all of his friends to be there. Perhaps Polish is different? Whatamidoing (WMF) (dyskusja) 19:09, 16 gru 2020 (CET)
- Te dyskusje nie znaczą, że jest to jednogłośne zdanie wszystkich wolontariuszy polskiej wikipedii — (Wypowiedź jest moją opinią, chyba że zaznaczono inaczej; proszę o brak tzw. pingów). — Paelius (dyskusja) 12:51, 16 gru 2020 (CET)