Wymieranie kredowe: Różnice pomiędzy wersjami

Z Wikipedii, wolnej encyklopedii
[wersja przejrzana][wersja nieprzejrzana]
Usunięta treść Dodana treść
redakcyjne, drobne merytoryczne, źródła/przypisy
z en.wiki 576006213
Linia 1: Linia 1:
{{pp-move-indef}}
[[Plik:Blakey 65moll.jpg|mały|300px|Rekonstrukcja układu lądów na przełomie kredy i paleogenu]]
[[Image:Impact event.jpg|thumb|Artist's rendering of a [[Meteoroid#Fireball|bolide]] impact]]
[[Plik:Extinction Intensity.png|thumb|300px|Intensywność wymierań organizmów morskich na przestrzeni poszczególnych [[ery i okresy geologiczne|okresów geologicznych]]: ''Botomanian'' – wczesny [[kambr]], ''Dresbachian'' – późny kambr, ''End O'' – koniec [[ordowik]]u, ''End S'' – koniec [[sylur]]u, ''Late D'' – górny [[dewon]], ''Middle C'' – środkowy [[karbon]], ''End Middle P'' – koniec środkowego [[perm]]u, ''End P'' – koniec permu, ''End Tr'' – koniec [[trias]]u, ''End J'' – koniec [[Jura|jury]], ''End K'' – koniec [[Kreda (okres)|kredy]], ''End Eocene'' – koniec [[eocen]]u]]
[[Image:KT boundary 054.jpg|thumb|[[Badlands]] near [[Drumheller, Alberta]], where erosion has exposed the [[K–Pg boundary]]]]
'''Wymieranie kredowe''' – najmłodsze ze znanych w historii Ziemi [[masowe wymieranie|masowych wymierań]], do którego doszło 66 milionów lat temu, na przełomie [[Kreda (okres)|kredy]] i [[paleogen]]u, a ściślej na przełomie [[mastrycht]]u i [[dan (geologia)|danu]]. Wymieranie to nastąpiło w krótkim czasie, być może znacznie krótszym niż kilkaset tysięcy lat.
[[Image:K-T-boundary.JPG|thumb|A Wyoming (U.S.) rock with an intermediate claystone layer that contains 1000 times more [[iridium]] than the upper and lower layers. Picture taken at the San Diego Natural History Museum]]


The '''Cretaceous–Paleogene (K–Pg) extinction event''',{{efn|It is often called the K–Pg extinction, K being the abbreviation for the German term for the Cretaceous, ''Kreide'', and Pg being the abbreviation for the [[Paleogene]].}} formerly known as the '''Cretaceous–Tertiary (K–T) extinction''',{{efn|It is perhaps better known as the Cretaceous–Tertiary (K–T) extinction, but the term [[Tertiary]] is now discouraged as a formal unit by the [[International Commission on Stratigraphy]].<ref>{{cite book|author=Ogg, James G.; Gradstein, F. M; Gradstein, Felix M.|title=A geologic time scale 2004|publisher=Cambridge University Press|location=Cambridge, UK|year=2004|isbn=0-521-78142-6}}</ref>}} was a [[extinction event|mass extinction]] of some three-quarters of plant and animal [[species]] on [[Earth]]&mdash;including all non-[[bird|avian]] [[dinosaur]]s—that occurred over a geologically short period of time 66 million years ([[Annum#SI prefix multipliers|Ma]]) ago.<ref>{{cite web|last=Anthony|first=Sebastian|title=Finally confirmed: An asteroid wiped out the dinosaurs|url=http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/147978-finally-confirmed-an-asteroid-wiped-out-the-dinosaurs}}</ref><ref name="Renne2013">{{cite journal|last=Renne|first=Paul R.|coauthors=Deino, Alan L.; Hilgen, Frederik J.; Kuiper, Klaudia F.; Mark, Darren F.; Mitchell III, William S.; Morgan, Leah E.; Mundil, Roland; Smit, Jan|title=Time Scales of Critical Events Around the Cretaceous-Paleogene Boundary|journal=Science|date=7 February 2013|volume=339|issue=6120|pages=684–687|doi=10.1126/science.1230492|url=http://www.sciencemag.org/content/339/6120/684|bibcode = 2013Sci...339..684R }}</ref><ref name="Fortey">{{cite book|last=Fortey|first=R|title=Life: A Natural History of the First Four Billion Years of Life on Earth|publisher=Vintage|year=1999|pages=238–260|isbn=978-0-375-70261-7}}</ref> It marked the end of the [[Cretaceous]] period and with it, the entire [[Mesozoic]] Era, opening the [[Cenozoic]] Era which continues today.
== Wymarłe organizmy ==
Było to jedno z pięciu największych wymierań w historii Ziemi; wyginęło wówczas ok. 75% wszystkich znanych gatunków, m.in.:
* wszystkie [[dinozaury]] oprócz [[ptaki|ptaków]],
* wszystkie [[pterozaury]],
* wiele grup morskich gadów – m.in. [[plezjozaury]] i [[mozazaury]],
* wszystkie [[belemnity]] i [[amonity]] (w 2005 roku ogłoszono odkrycie w Danii gatunku amonita ''[[Hoploscaphites|Hoploscaphites constrictus]]'' z wczesnego [[paleogen]]u, który jednak również szybko wymarł<ref name=MM05>{{Cytuj pismo |nazwisko=Machalski |imię=Marcin |tytuł=Late Maastrichtian and earliest Danian scaphitid ammonites from central Europe: Taxonomy, evolution, and extinction |czasopismo=Acta Palaeontologica Polonica |wolumin=50 |wydanie=4 |strony=653–696 |rok=2005 |url=http://www.app.pan.pl/archive/published/app50/app50-653.pdf |język=en}}</ref>),
* wiele roślin lądowych z wyjątkiem np. [[paprotniki|paprotników]], które przetrwały wymieranie z niewielkimi stratami i przeżyły znaczny rozwój we wczesnym [[paleogen]]ie,
* większość [[otwornice|otwornic]],
* oraz wiele innych gatunków i rodzajów organizmów.


In the [[geologic record]], the K-Pg event is marked by a thin layer of [[sediment]] called the [[Cretaceous–Paleogene boundary|K–Pg boundary]], which can be found throughout the world in marine and terrestrial rocks. The boundary clay shows high levels of the metal [[iridium]], which is rare in the [[Crust (geology)#Earth's crust|Earth's crust]] but abundant in asteroids.
== Główne przyczyny ==
Pojawiło się wiele hipotez na temat wymierania kredowego, jednak do dziś nie ma jednomyślności co do jego przyczyn. Niektórzy naukowcy twierdzą, że jedyną przyczyną wymierania kredowego są zmiany środowiska wywołane [[katastrofa kosmiczna|uderzeniem planetoidy]] w Chicxulub{{r|Schulteetal}}, jednak z interpretacją taką nie zgadza się wielu paleontologów i geologów, którzy sugerują, że wymieranie kredowe spowodowane było wieloma czynnikami. Obecnie wpływ impaktu na wymieranie kredowe nie jest jednak negowany{{r|response}}.Innym ważnym czynnikiem był wzmożony [[wulkanizm]] w [[Indie|Indiach]], który utworzył [[Trapy Dekanu]].


It is generally believed that the K-Pg extinction was triggered by [[Chicxulub impactor|a massive comet/asteroid impact]] and its catastrophic effects on the global environment, including a lingering [[impact winter]] that made it impossible for [[plant]]s and [[plankton]] to carry out [[photosynthesis]].<ref name=Alvarez/> The impact hypothesis was bolstered by the discovery of the {{convert|180|km|0|adj=mid|-wide}} [[Chicxulub crater]] in the [[Gulf of Mexico]] in the late 1970s,<ref name="Hildebrand, A. R. 1991">Hildebrand, A. R., G. T. Penfield, et al. (1991). "Chicxulub crater: a possible Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary impact crater on the Yucatan peninsula, Mexico." Geology 19: 867-871.</ref> which provided conclusive evidence that the K–Pg boundary clay represented debris from an asteroid impact.<ref name="Schulte10">{{Cite doi|10.1126/science.1177265}}</ref> The fact that the extinctions occurred at the same time as the impact provides strong evidence that the K–Pg extinction was caused by the asteroid.<ref name="Schulte10"/> However, some scientists maintain the extinction was caused or exacerbated by other factors, such as volcanic eruptions,<ref>Keller, G. (2012). The Cretaceous--Tertiary Mass Extinction, Chicxulub Impact, and Deccan Volcanism. Earth and Life, Springer: 759--793.</ref> climate change, and/or sea level change.
=== Kolizja ===
==== Argumenty ====
Jednym z głównych dowodów na katastrofę kosmiczną jest istnienie serii [[krater uderzeniowy|kraterów uderzeniowych]], które powstały właśnie ok. 66 milionów lat temu. Największym potwierdzonym kraterem z tego okresu jest [[krater Chicxulub]] (a właściwie jego pozostałości), znajdujący się na [[Jukatan (półwysep)|półwyspie Jukatan]] w [[Ameryka Środkowa|Ameryce Środkowej]]. Jego rozmiary są olbrzymie – sam krater ma średnicę 150 km<ref>{{cytuj stronę | url = http://www.passc.net/EarthImpactDatabase/chicxulub.html | tytuł = Chicxulub | praca = Earth Impact Database | opublikowany = Planetary and Space Science Centre, University of New Brunswick | język = en | data dostępu = 2012-08-19}}</ref>, a jego zewnętrzny pierścień ma średnicę ok. 300 km<ref name=SM97>{{Cytuj pismo |imię=Virgil L. |nazwisko=Sharpton |imię2=Luis E. |nazwisko2=Marín |tytuł=The Cretaceous-Tertiary impact crater and the cosmic projectile that produced it |czasopismo=Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences |wolumin=822 |strony=353–380 |rok=1997 |doi=10.1111/j.1749-6632.1997.tb48351.x |język=en}}</ref>, jego głębokość to 1600 metrów. Mimo to jego odnalezienie sprawiło początkowo wiele trudności, gdyż został pokryty grubą warstwą [[osady|osadów]]. Innym potencjalnym kraterem uderzeniowym o jeszcze większych rozmiarach jest [[krater Śiwa]] na dnie [[Ocean Indyjski|Oceanu Indyjskiego]], jednak meteorytowe pochodzenie tej struktury nie zostało potwierdzone. Struktura ta jest jeszcze większa – jej średnica wynosi około 500 km, co sugeruje, iż bolid, który pozostawił taki krater, miał około 40 km średnicy. Uderzenie w Ziemię obiektu o takiej wielkości uwolniłoby 1,45{{e|25}} [[dżul]]i [[energia kinetyczna|energii kinetycznej]] i doprowadziło do kilku anomalii geodynamicznych<ref name=Chatterjee09>{{Cytuj pismo |autor=[[Sankar Chatterjee]], Naresh M. Mehrotra |tytuł=The significance of the contemporaneous Shiva impact structure and Deccan volcanism at the KT boundary |czasopismo=Geological Society of America. Abstracts with Programs |wolumin=41 |wydanie=7 |strony=160 |rok=2009 |url=http://gsa.confex.com/gsa/2009AM/finalprogram/abstract_160197.htm |język=en}}</ref>.


A wide range of species perished in the K–Pg extinction. The most well-known victims are the non-avian dinosaurs. However, the extinction also hit other terrestrial organisms, including [[mammal]]s, [[pterosaur]]s, [[bird]]s,<ref>Longrich, N. R., T. T. Tokaryk, et al. (2011). "Mass extinction of birds at the Cretaceous-Paleogene (K–Pg) boundary." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108(37): 15253-15257.</ref> lizards,<ref name="Longrich, N. R. 2012">Longrich, N. R., A.-B. S. Bhullar, et al. (2012). "Mass extinction of lizards and snakes at the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences doi: 10.1073/pnas.1211526110</ref> insects,<ref>Labandeira, C. C., K. R. Johnson, et al. (2002). "Preliminary assessment of insect herbivory across the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary: major extinction and minimum rebound." Geological Society of America Special Paper 361: 297-327.</ref> and plants.<ref name="Nichols, D. J 2008">Nichols, D. J. and K. R. Johnson (2008). Plants and the K–T Boundary. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.</ref> In the oceans, the K–Pg extinction devastated the giant marine lizards ([[Mosasaur]]idae), plesiosaurs, fish,<ref>Friedman, M. (2009). "Ecomorphological selectivity among marine teleost fishes during the end-Cretaceous extinction." PNAS 106: 5218-5223.</ref> sharks, mollusks (especially [[ammonites]]) and many species of plankton. It is estimated that 75% or more of all species on Earth vanished.<ref>Jablonski, D., 1994. Extinctions in the fossil record (and discussion). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B. 344, 11-17.</ref> Yet the devastation caused by the extinction also provided evolutionary opportunities. In the wake of the extinction, many groups underwent remarkable [[adaptive radiation]]s — a sudden and prolific divergence into new forms and species within the disrupted and emptied ecological niches resulting from the event. Mammals in particular diversified in the Paleogene,<ref name="Alroy, J. 1999">Alroy, J. (1999). "The fossil record of North American Mammals: evidence for a Palaeocene evolutionary radiation." Systematic Biology 48(1): 107-118.</ref> producing new forms such as horses, whales, bats, and primates. Birds,<ref name="Feduccia, A. 1995">Feduccia, A. (1995). "Explosive evolution in Tertiary birds and mammals." Science 267: 637-638.</ref> fish<ref name="Friedman, M. 2010">Friedman, M. (2010). "Explosive morphological diversification of spiny-finned teleost fishes in the aftermath of the end-Cretaceous extinction." Proceedings of the Royal Society B 277: 1675-1683.</ref> and perhaps lizards<ref name="Longrich, N. R. 2012"/> also radiated.
Innym dużym kraterem z tego okresu jest [[Krater Bołtysz|Bołtysz]] w pobliżu [[Kirowohrad]]u na Ukrainie, o średnicy 24 kilometrów, utworzony prawdopodobnie co najmniej 2–5 tys. lat przed Chicxulub{{r|geology10}}. Oprócz niego na dnie [[Morze Północne|Morza Północnego]] odkryto strukturę [[krater Silverpit|Silverpit]] o średnicy między 2,4 km a 10 kilometrów, prawdopodobnie będącą kraterem uderzeniowym, który powstał w okresie od 60 do 65 milionów lat temu. Ponadto dwa mniejsze kratery, [[krater Vista Alegre]] w Brazylii i [[Eagle Butte (krater)|Eagle Butte]] w Kanadzie mogły powstać w tym samym czasie, jednak ich wiek jest określony z małą dokładnością i mogą być w rzeczywistości młodsze.
[[Plik:K-T boundary TLSP.jpg|thumb|250px|[[Wychodnia]] w [[Trinidad Lake State Park]], stan [[Kolorado]] ([[Stany Zjednoczone|USA]]); linia wskazuje [[Granica K-T|granicę K-T]]]]
Zmiany w skałach pochodzących z poprzednich epok są w miejscach kolizji podobne do zmian wywołanych przez wybuchy nuklearne, co jest poważnym dowodem, że kratery te są pochodzenia kosmicznego, a w żadnym razie nie [[wulkan]]icznego. Innym potwierdzeniem tej tezy jest fakt, że w warstwie osadów między kredą a paleogenem (tzw. [[granica K-T]], "granica kreda-trzeciorzęd") występuje bardzo duże stężenie [[iryd]]u (nawet do 500 [[ppb]]), którego w [[skorupa ziemska|skorupie ziemskiej]] praktycznie nie ma (średnia dla innych skał 0,3 ppb), natomiast występuje obficie w [[meteoryt]]ach. Stężenie to jest bardzo duże w skałach Ameryki (blisko miejsca upadku) i znacznie mniejsze po przeciwnej (przy uwzględnieniu ruchu kontynentów) stronie globu. Występuje tu też skok stężenia wielu innych pierwiastków, takich jak [[osm]], [[złoto]], [[platyna]], [[nikiel]], [[kobalt]], [[pallad]] i [[metale ziem rzadkich]]. Ich względne proporcje zgadzają się z tymi obserwowanymi w meteorytach.


==Extinction patterns==
==== Pochodzenie impaktora ====
{{annotated image/Extinction|float=left}} The K–Pg extinction event was severe, global, rapid, and selective. In terms of severity, the event eliminated a vast number of species. Based on marine fossils, it is estimated that 75% or more of all species were wiped out by the K–Pg extinction.<ref>Jablonski, D. (1994). "Extinctions in the fossil record (and discussion)." Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B. 344(1307): 11-17.</ref> This is a rough estimate. It is difficult to estimate diversity for modern ecosystems, let alone for fossil ones, and the data are derived primarily from marine invertebrates. Terrestrial organisms, especially insects, represent much of the diversity, but have a poorer record. Despite this, the high levels of extinction seen in terrestrial and marine fossils indicate that the K–Pg extinction is the most severe extinction in the past 250 million years.
Badania amerykańsko-czeskiego zespołu w [[2007]] roku wskazywały, że planetoidy które uderzyły w Ziemię 66 mln lat temu, mogły pochodzić ze zderzenia w [[Pas planetoid|pasie planetoid]] ok. 160 mln lat temu, które utworzyło planetoidę [[(298) Baptistina]]. Mniejsze fragmenty macierzystego ciała zostały wyrzucone na orbity przecinające się z orbitą Ziemi, a następnie zderzyły się z Ziemią oraz utworzyły [[Tycho (krater księżycowy)|krater Tycho]] na [[Księżyc]]u<ref>{{Cytuj stronę |url = http://www.physorg.com/news108218928.html |tytuł = Breakup event in the main asteroid belt likely caused dinosaur extinction 65 million years ago |opublikowany = Physorg |data =2006-09-05 |data dostępu =2008-02-10 |język = en}}</ref>. Późniejsze analizy obserwacji sondy [[Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer|WISE]] wskazują jednak, że rozpad macierzystego ciała Baptistiny nastąpił 80 milionów lat temu, co znacznie zmniejsza prawdopodobieństwo, że jeden (lub kilka) z fragmentów uderzył w Ziemię pod koniec kredy<ref>{{cytuj stronę|url=http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/09/110919144042.htm|tytuł=NASA's WISE Raises Doubt About Asteroid Family Believed Responsible for Dinosaur Extinction|data=2011-09-19|opublikowany=ScienceDaily|język=en|data dostępu=2012-05-08}}</ref>.


The K–Pg extinction was a global event. The event appears to have hit all continents at the same time. Dinosaurs, for example, are known from the Maastrichtian of North America, Europe, Asia, Africa, South America and Antarctica,<ref>Weishampel, D. B., P. M. Barrett, et al. (2004). Dinosaur Distribution. The Dinosauria. D. B. Weishampel, P. Dodson and H. Osmolska. Berkeley, University of California Press: 517-606.</ref> but are unknown from the Cenozoic anywhere in the world. Similarly, fossil pollen show devastation of the plant communities in areas as far flung as New Mexico, Alaska, China, and New Zealand.<ref name="Nichols, D. J 2008"/> The event also affected all seas and oceans. Widespread groups such as mosasaurs and ammonites disappeared around the world. Furthermore, the extinctions occurred at the same time on land and in the sea.
==== Przebieg impaktu ====
Duży impakt, oraz tworzenie się w tym samym czasie [[Trapy Dekanu|trapów Dekanu]], miały dewastujący wpływ na klimat globalny i skutkowały [[Katastrofa ekologiczna|katastrofami ekologicznymi]], które mogły doprowadzić do wyginięcia wielu grup zwierząt. Na skutek uderzenia planetoidy [[Skała|skały]] podłoża stopiły się, a [[węglany]] uwolniły duże ilości [[Dwutlenek węgla|dwutlenku węgla]]. Z miejsca kolizji rozprzestrzeniły się [[fala uderzeniowa|fale uderzeniowe]] - w [[atmosfera|atmosferze]], w postaci chmury rozgrzanych [[gaz]]ów, skał i pyłu, we wnętrzu Ziemi, w postaci [[fala sejsmiczna|fal sejsmicznych]], oraz w morzu, tworząc w [[Zatoka Meksykańska|Zatoce Meksykańskiej]] olbrzymie [[tsunami]], które było w stanie wedrzeć się głęboko w ląd. Opad z chmury ognistej powodował [[pożar]]y na ogromną skalę. Fale sejsmiczne po przejściu przez Ziemię zogniskowały się po przeciwnej stronie globu, kilka tysięcy kilometrów na wschód od wulkanów Dekanu, dając efekt podobny do mniejszego impaktu<ref name=Princeton>{{cytuj stronę|url=http://www.princeton.edu/main/news/archive/S31/90/32S94/|tytuł=Impact study: Princeton model shows fallout of a giant meteorite strike|nazwisko=Kelly|imię=Morgan|data=2011-10-19|opublikowany=Princeton University|język=en|data dostępu=2012-05-08}}</ref>.


The fossil record shows that the tempo of the K–Pg extinction was extremely rapid, occurring on a scale of thousands of years or less. In some cases, it is possible to study fossils on a very fine scale - centimeter-by-centimeter - through the K–Pg rocks. Examples include marine microfossils, such as calcareous nanoplankton and foraminifera, and terrestrial plant pollen. Here, the fossils show that the ecosystem remained relatively stable up to the K–Pg boundary, at which point many species suddenly vanish. For groups with a poorer fossil record, such as dinosaurs, fossils are unlikely to be preserved just below the K–Pg boundary. For example, only a few dozen ''Tyrannosaurus'' skeletons are known, and so the odds of finding one a few centimeters below the boundary are low. This effect, called the [[Signor-Lipps effect]], causes many species appear to vanish before the K–Pg boundary, creating the illusion of gradual extinction. Nevertheless, improved sampling shows that groups once thought to undergo a slow decline, such as dinosaurs, actually disappear suddenly near the K–Pg boundary. Reworking—when fossils are eroded from older rocks and deposited into younger rocks—can also make extinction appear gradual. For example, in the Bug Creek Anthills beds in Montana, dinosaur fossils occur alongside mammals from the earliest Paleocene, which created the illusion that dinosaurs dwindled as mammals radiated. Reworked fossils are recognized because they tend to be rare and are often damaged by the reworking.
Skutki mogły być jeszcze większe, jeżeli istotnie miały miejsce dwa wielkie impakty – Chicxulub i Śiwa – następujące po sobie w krótkim odstępie czasu i występujące niemal w antypodalnej pozycji{{r|Chatterjee09}}.


The patterns are critical to understanding the cause of the extinctions. The fact that the extinction is severe, global, and rapid suggests that the extinctions result from a severe, global, and rapid environmental disturbance: an environmental catastrophe. In the 1970s and 1980s, this led scientists to seriously consider catastrophic mechanisms such as supernovas, volcanic eruptions, and asteroids, and sparked new interest in [[catastrophism]] in geology and paleontology.
Duża część pyłów pozostała na długo w atmosferze, zasłaniając Słońce (do atmosfery unieść mogło się łącznie 25 bilionów ton skał<ref>[http://www.lpi.usra.edu/features/chicxulub/ Zderzenie meteorytu z Ziemią.]</ref>, z kolei inna hipoteza mówi o nawet 900 bilionach ton samego węgla<ref>[http://www.universetoday.com/14077/asteroid-impact-created-a-worldwide-rain-of-carbon-beads/ Upadek meteorytu mógł spowodować deszcz węgla.]</ref>). Pozbawione światła rośliny ginęły, powodując załamanie się [[łańcuch pokarmowy|łańcucha pokarmowego]] i śmierć zarówno roślinożerców jak i drapieżników. Wyginęła większość gatunków mikroskopijnych morskich [[Otwornice|otwornic]]. Ilość {{chem|CO|2}} w atmosferze jeszcze przez długi czas była bardzo wysoka, padały też [[Kwaśny deszcz|kwaśne deszcze]]. Większość dużych zwierząt nie miało szans na przeżycie. Poza tym im większy jest gatunek, tym mniej osobników do niego należy. Zwierzęta mniejsze miały więc większe szanse przetrwać z dwojakich powodów: poszczególne osobniki – małych rozmiarów i małych [[Wymagania pokarmowe|wymagań pokarmowych]], gatunki – większej liczebności. Jeśli krater Śiwa został utworzony przez późniejszy impakt, przyroda miałaby możliwość częściowego odbudowania się, zanim przyszła kolejna katastrofa.


The extinction was also highly selective. Some groups were relatively unaffected, others were devastated, and some were eliminated entirely. Many species of alligator, turtle, and salamander survived, for example. Mammals, birds, and lizards suffered high rates of extinction. Non-avian dinosaurs and pterosaurs were wiped out entirely.
=== Wulkanizm ===
66 milionów lat temu w [[Indie|Indiach]] panował niezwykle wzmożony wulkanizm, powstawały pokrywy lawowe zajmujące 500&nbsp;000&nbsp;[[kilometr kwadratowy|km²]] – [[Trapy Dekanu]]. Obecnie wydaje się jednak, że zjawisko to miało charakter zbyt długotrwały, by samodzielnie spowodować tak szybką zagładę. Wpływu na środowisko zjawisk wulkanicznych, zachodzących na tak dużą skalę, nie można jednak pominąć. Niektórzy naukowcy spekulowali, że ich przyczyną mogła być opisana wyżej kolizja – energia impaktu miałaby zgromadzić się po przeciwnej stronie Ziemi, powodując wybuchy wulkanów – jednak Indie w momencie zderzenia nie znajdowały się po drugiej stronie kuli ziemskiej, a energia przeniesiona przez fale sejsmiczne była za mała, by spowodować tak duże skutki{{r|Princeton}}. Jeżeli jednak miało miejsce drugie uderzenie (Śiwa), to nie pozostało bez wpływu na wulkanizm Dekanu.


Even though the boundary event was severe, there was significant variability in the rate of extinction between and within different [[clade]]s. Species that depended on [[photosynthesis]] declined or became extinct as atmospheric particles blocked sunlight and reduced the [[solar energy]] reaching the Earth's surface. This plant extinction caused a major reshuffling of the dominant plant groups.<ref name="autogenerated347">{{cite journal|author=Wilf P, Johnson KR |title=Land plant extinction at the end of the Cretaceous: a quantitative analysis of the North Dakota megafloral record |journal=Paleobiology |year=2004 |volume=30 |issue=3 |pages=347–368 |doi = 10.1666/0094-8373(2004)030<0347:LPEATE>2.0.CO;2|issn=0094-8373}}</ref> Photosynthesizing organisms, including [[phytoplankton]] and land plants, formed the foundation of the [[food chain]] in the late Cretaceous as they do today. Evidence suggests that [[herbivores|herbivorous]] animals died out when the plants they depended on for food became scarce. Consequently, top [[predator]]s such as ''[[Tyrannosaurus|Tyrannosaurus rex]]'' also perished.
== Inne hipotezy ==
=== Supernowa ===
Duże ilości [[iryd]]u wskazywałyby nie tylko na możliwość kolizji z innym ciałem niebieskim, ale także wybuch [[Supernowa|supernowej]] niedaleko [[Ziemia|Ziemi]]. Hipotezę tę obalono, oznaczając w próbce osadu z granicy K/T zawartość <sup>244</sup>[[Pluton (pierwiastek)|Pu]]. [[Izotopy|Izotop]] ten musiałby się tam znaleźć, jeśli hipoteza supernowej była słuszna. Z kolei izotop ten prawie nie występuje na Ziemi, nie mógłby więc pochodzić z innego źródła. Nieliczne pierwsze wyniki badań potwierdzające obecność plutonu jeszcze przed opublikowaniem wyników zostały uznane za błędne, wszystkie kolejne wykluczyły obecność plutonu-244 i hipoteza ta została obalona.


[[Coccolithophorids]] and [[mollusc]]s (including [[ammonite]]s, [[rudist]]s, freshwater [[snail]]s and [[mussel]]s), and those organisms whose [[food chain]] included these shell builders, became extinct or suffered heavy losses. For example, it is thought that ammonites were the principal food of [[mosasaur]]s, a group of giant marine [[reptiles]] that became extinct at the boundary.<ref name="Kauffman">{{cite journal| author =Kauffman E| authorlink =| title =Mosasaur Predation on Upper Cretaceous Nautiloids and Ammonites from the United States Pacific Coast | journal =PALAIOS | volume =19 | issue =1 | pages =96–100 | publisher =Society for Sedimentary Geology | url=http://palaios.geoscienceworld.org/cgi/reprint/19/1/96
=== Nemezis ===
| doi = 10.1669/0883-1351(2004)019<0096:MPOUCN>2.0.CO;2 |accessdate=2007-06-17 | year =2004| issn =0883-1351}}</ref>
Od kiedy [[Paleontologia|paleontolodzy]] [[Dave Raup]] i [[Jack Sepkoski]] opublikowali tekst, w którym udowadniali, że masowe wymierania zdarzają się cyklicznie co 26 milionów lat<ref name=RS86>{{Cytuj pismo |imię=Dave |nazwisko=Raup |imię2=John J. |nazwisko2=Sepkoski |tytuł=Periodic extinction of families and genera |czasopismo=Science |wolumin=231 |wydanie=4740 |strony=833–836 |rok=1986 |doi=10.1126/science.11542060 |język=en}}</ref>, niektórzy badacze doszli do wniosku, że [[Słońce]] to tak naprawdę [[gwiazda podwójna]]. Jego hipotetyczny towarzysz nazwany [[Nemesis (astronomia)|Nemesis]] miał raz w ciągu tego okresu przybliżać się do [[Układ Słoneczny|Układu Słonecznego]] i zaburzać orbity [[kometa|komet]] [[Obłok Oorta|Obłoku Oorta]], wskutek czego te zbliżające się do Słońca przecinały orbitę Ziemi, co miało skutkować zderzeniem. Jak dotąd nikt nie znalazł ani tej gwiazdy, ani też żadnego dowodu na jej istnienie. Ponadto [[Masowe wymieranie|wielkich wymierań]] było 5, w różnych okresach, a mniejszych bardzo wiele i mogły mieć różne przyczyny.


[[Omnivores]], [[insectivores]] and [[carrion]]-eaters survived the extinction event, perhaps because of the increased availability of their food sources. At the end of the Cretaceous there seems to have been no purely herbivorous or [[carnivore|carnivorous]] mammals. Mammals and birds that survived the extinction fed on [[insect]]s, [[worm]]s, and snails, which in turn fed on dead plant and animal matter. Scientists hypothesize that these organisms survived the collapse of plant-based food chains because they fed on [[detritus (biology)|detritus]] (non-living organic material).<ref name="MacLeod">{{cite journal |author=MacLeod N, Rawson PF, Forey PL, Banner FT, Boudagher-Fadel MK, Bown PR, Burnett JA, Chambers, P, Culver S, Evans SE, Jeffery C, Kaminski MA, Lord AR, Milner AC, Milner AR, Morris N, Owen E, Rosen BR, Smith AB, Taylor PD, Urquhart E, Young JR |title=The Cretaceous–Tertiary biotic transition |year=1997 |journal=Journal of the Geological Society |volume=154 |issue=2 |pages=265–292 |url=http://jgs.lyellcollection.org/content/154/2/265.short |doi=10.1144/gsjgs.154.2.0265}}</ref><ref name="SheehanHansen">{{cite journal| author=Sheehan Peter M, Hansen Thor A | title =Detritus feeding as a buffer to extinction at the end of the Cretaceous | journal =Geology | volume =14 |issue =10| pages =868–870| year =1986| url =http://geology.geoscienceworld.org/cgi/content/abstract/14/10/868| doi =10.1130/0091-7613(1986)14<868:DFAABT>2.0.CO;2|accessdate =2007-07-04| issn=0091-7613|bibcode = 1986Geo....14..868S }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|title=Faunal evidence for reduced productivity and uncoordinated recovery in Southern Hemisphere Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary sections|author=Aberhan M, Weidemeyer S, Kieesling W, Scasso RA, Medina FA |year=2007 |journal=Geology |volume=35 |issue=3 |pages=227–230 |doi=10.1130/G23197A.1|bibcode = 2007Geo....35..227A }}</ref>
=== Uniformitarianizm ===
W geologii długo pokutował pogląd, że procesy kształtujące życie na Ziemi zawsze zachodziły powoli i stopniowo, jak (w ogólności) ma to miejsce obecnie. Odkrycie granicy K/T stanowiło problem; zwolennicy tej tezy wysnuli wniosek, że z nieznanych przyczyn nie zachowały się osady z okresu dzielącego dwie strony tej granicy. Do głosu doszła nawet koncepcja, według której kredę i trzeciorzęd dzieli okres dłuższy niż cały [[kenozoik]], jako że tłumaczyła różnice świata roślinnego i zwierzęcego w mezozoiku i kenozoiku<ref>{{cytuj książkę | nazwisko = Leddra | imię = Michael | tytuł = Time Matters: Geology's Legacy to Scientific Thought | wydawca = John Wiley & Sons | data = 2010 | strony = 133}}</ref>. Hipoteza ta została jednoznacznie obalona.


In [[stream]] [[Biocoenosis|communities]] few animal groups became extinct because stream communities rely less directly on food from living plants and more on detritus that washes in from land, buffering them from extinction.<ref>{{cite journal |title=Major extinctions of land-dwelling vertebrates at the Cretaceous–Tertiary boundary, eastern Montana |author=Sheehan Peter M, Fastovsky DE |year=1992 |journal=Geology |volume=20 |issue=6 | pages=556–560 |url=http://www.geoscienceworld.org/cgi/georef/1992034409 |accessdate=2007-06-22 |doi=10.1130/0091-7613(1992)020<0556:MEOLDV>2.3.CO;2|bibcode = 1992Geo....20..556S }}</ref> Similar, but more complex patterns have been found in the oceans. Extinction was more severe among animals living in the [[Pelagic zone|water column]] than among animals living on or in the sea floor. Animals in the water column are almost entirely dependent on [[primary production]] from living phytoplankton while animals living on or in the [[ocean floor]] feed on detritus or can switch to detritus feeding.<ref name="MacLeod"/>
== Zobacz też ==
* [[granica K-T]], poprawnie: K-Pg
* [[masowe wymieranie]]


The largest air-breathing survivors of the event, [[crocodyliform]]s and [[Choristodera|champsosaurs]], were semi-aquatic and had access to detritus. Modern crocodilians can live as scavengers and can survive for months without food, and their young are small, grow slowly, and feed largely on invertebrates and dead organisms or fragments of organisms for their first few years. These characteristics have been linked to crocodilian survival at the end of the Cretaceous.<ref name="SheehanHansen"/>
{{Przypisy|przypisy=
<ref name=Schulteetal>{{Cytuj pismo |autor=Peter Schulte i inni |tytuł=The Chicxulub asteroid impact and mass extinction at the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary |czasopismo=Science |wolumin=327 |wydanie=5970 |strony=1214–1218 |rok=2010 |doi=10.1126/science.1177265 |język=en}}</ref>
<ref name=response>{{Cytuj pismo |autor=J. David Archibald i inni |tytuł=Cretaceous extinctions: multiple causes |czasopismo=Science |wolumin=328 |wydanie=5981 |strony=973 |rok=2010 |doi=10.1126/science.328.5981.973-a |język=en}}</ref>
<ref name=geology10>{{Cytuj pismo |autor=David Jolley, Iain Gilmour, Eugene Gurov, Simon Kelley, Jonathan Watson |tytuł=Two large meteorite impacts at the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary |czasopismo=Geology |wolumin=38 |wydanie=9 |strony=835–838 |rok=2010 |doi=10.1130/G31034.1 |język=en}}</ref>}}


After the K–Pg extinction event, biodiversity required substantial time to recover, despite the existence of abundant vacant [[ecological niche]]s.<ref name="MacLeod"/>
== Literatura ==
* [[Walter Alvarez]], ''Dinozaury i krater śmierci'', (''T. rex and the crater of doom'', 1997 r.)


===Microbiota===
[[Kategoria:Kreda]]
The K–Pg boundary represents one of the most dramatic turnovers in the [[fossil record]] for various [[calcareous]] [[nanoplankton]] that formed the [[calcium]] deposits that gave the Cretaceous its name. The turnover in this group is clearly marked at the species level.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Pospichal JJ |title=Calcareous nannofossils and clastic sediments at the Cretaceous–Tertiary boundary, northeastern Mexico |year=1996 |journal=Geology |volume=24 |issue=3 |pages=255–258 |url=http://geology.geoscienceworld.org/cgi/content/abstract/24/3/255 |doi=10.1130/0091-7613(1996)024<0255:CNACSA>2.3.CO;2|bibcode = 1996Geo....24..255P }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |author=Bown P |year=2005 |title=Selective calcareous nannoplankton survivorship at the Cretaceous–Tertiary boundary |journal=Geology |volume=33 |issue=8 |pages=653–656 |url=http://geology.geoscienceworld.org/cgi/content/abstract/33/8/653 | doi =10.1130/G21566.1 |bibcode = 2005Geo....33..653B }}</ref> Statistical analysis of [[marine (ocean)|marine]] losses at this time suggests that the decrease in diversity was caused more by a sharp increase in extinctions than by a decrease in [[speciation]].<ref>{{Cite journal | author=Bambach RK, Knoll AH, Wang SC | title=Origination, extinction, and mass depletions of marine diversity | journal=Paleobiology | volume=30 | issue=4 | pages=522–542 | year=2004 |doi=10.1666/0094-8373(2004)030<0522:OEAMDO>2.0.CO;2 |url=http://paleobiol.geoscienceworld.org/cgi/content/abstract/30/4/522 | issn=0094-8373 }}</ref> The K–Pg boundary record of [[dinoflagellate]]s is not as well-understood, mainly because only [[microbial cyst]]s provide a fossil record, and not all dinoflagellate species have cyst-forming stages, thereby likely causing diversity to be underestimated.<ref name="MacLeod"/> Recent studies indicate that there were no major shifts in dinoflagellates through the boundary layer.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Gedl P |title=Dinoflagellate cyst record of the deep-sea Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary at Uzgru, Carpathian Mountains, Czech Republic |journal=Geological Society, London, Special Publications |year=2004 |volume=230 |pages=257–273 |doi=10.1144/GSL.SP.2004.230.01.13 |bibcode = 2004GSLSP.230..257G }}</ref>
[[Kategoria:Upadki ciał niebieskich]]

[[Kategoria:Masowe wymieranie|kredowe]]
[[Radiolaria]] have left a geological record since at least the [[Ordovician]] times, and their mineral fossil skeletons can be tracked across the K–Pg boundary. There is no evidence of mass extinction of these organisms, and there is support for high productivity of these species in [[Antarctic Circle|southern high latitudes]] as a result of cooling temperatures in the early Paleocene.<ref name="MacLeod"/> Approximately 46% of [[diatom]] species survived the transition from the Cretaceous to the Upper [[Paleocene]]. This suggests a significant turnover in species, but not a catastrophic extinction of diatoms, across the K–Pg boundary.<ref name="MacLeod"/><ref>{{cite journal |author=MacLeod N |title=Impacts and marine invertebrate extinctions |year=1998 |journal=Geological Society, London, Special Publications |volume=140 |pages=217–246 |url=http://sp.lyellcollection.org/cgi/content/abstract/140/1/217 | doi = 10.1144/GSL.SP.1998.140.01.16 |issue=1|bibcode = 1998GSLSP.140..217M }}</ref>

The occurrence of [[plankton]]ic [[foraminifera]] across the K–Pg boundary has been studied since the 1930s.<ref>{{cite book | last=Courtillot|first= V | title =Evolutionary Catastrophes: The Science of Mass Extinction | publisher =Cambridge University Press | year=1999 | location =| page =2| url =http://books.google.com/?id=qiegJbafYkUC&pg=PA23&lpg=PA23&dq=foraminifera+kt+1930s | doi =| id = | isbn =0-521-58392-6}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |author=Glaessner MF |title=Studien über Foraminiferen aus der Kreide und dem Tertiär des Kaukasus: die Foraminiferen der ältesten Tertiärschichten des Nordwestkaukasus |language=German |journal=Проблемс оф палеонтологий - Problems of Paleontology |volume=2–3 |pages=349–410 |year=1937 |oclc=776158910 }}</ref> Research spurred by the possibility of an impact event at the K–Pg boundary resulted in numerous publications detailing planktonic foraminiferal extinction at the boundary.<ref name="MacLeod"/> However, there is debate ongoing between groups that believe the evidence indicates substantial extinction of these species at the K–Pg boundary,<ref>{{cite journal |author=Arenillas I, Arz JA, Molina E and Dupuis C|title=An independent test of planktic foraminiferal turnover across the Cretaceous/Paleogene (K/P) boundary at El Kef, Tunisia: catastrophic mass extinction and possible survivorship |journal=Micropaleontology |year=2000 |volume=46 |issue=1 |pages=31–49 |jstor=1486024 }}</ref> and those who believe the evidence supports multiple extinctions and expansions through the boundary.<ref name="MacLeod2">{{cite book |last=MacLeod|first= N |year=1996 |title=Nature of the Cretaceous-Tertiary (K–T) planktonic foraminiferal record: stratigraphic confidence intervals, Signor-Lipps effect, and patterns of survivorship. In: Cretaceous–Tertiary Mass Extinctions: Biotic and Environmental Changes (MacLeod N, Keller G, editors) |publisher=WW Norton |pages=85–138 |isbn=978-0-393-96657-2}}</ref><ref name="Keller">{{cite journal |author=Keller G, Adatte T, Stinnesbeck W, Rebolledo-Vieyra, Fucugauchi JU, Kramar U, Stüben D |year=2004 |title=Chicxulub impact predates the K–T boundary mass extinction |journal=PNAS |volume=101 |pages=3753–3758 |doi=10.1073/pnas.0400396101 |pmid=15004276 |issue=11 |pmc=374316 |bibcode = 2004PNAS..101.3753K }}</ref>

Numerous species of [[benthic]] foraminifera became extinct during the K–Pg extinction event, presumably because they depend on organic debris for nutrients, since the [[biomass (ecology)|biomass]] in the ocean is thought to have decreased. However, as the marine microbiota recovered, it is thought that increased speciation of benthic foraminifera resulted from the increase in food sources.<ref name="MacLeod"/> Phytoplankton recovery in the early Paleocene provided the food source to support large benthic foraminiferal assemblages, which are mainly detritus-feeding. Ultimate recovery of the benthic populations occurred over several stages lasting several hundred thousand years into the early Paleocene.<ref>{{cite journal |title=Deep-sea benthic foraminiferal recolonisation following a volcaniclastic event in the lower Campanian of the Scaglia Rossa Formation (Umbria-Marche Basin, central Italy)|url=http://www.es.ucl.ac.uk/people/m-kaminski/reprints-pdfs/Galeotti_etal2002.pdf |format=PDF|author=Galeotti S, Bellagamba M, Kaminski MA, and Montanari A |year=2002 |journal=Marine Micropaleontology |volume=44 |pages=57–76 |accessdate=2007-08-19}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |title=8. Cretaceous to Paleogene benthic foraminifers from the Iberia abyssal plain |author=Kuhnt W, Collins ES |year=1996 |journal=Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Results |volume=149 |pages=203–216 |url=http://www-odp.tamu.edu/publications/149_SR/VOLUME/CHAPTERS/SR149_08.PDF |format=PDF|accessdate=2007-08-19}}</ref>

===Marine invertebrates===
[[Image:Amonites.Domus da Coruña.jpg|thumb|An [[ammonite]] fossil]]

There is variability in the fossil record as to the extinction rate of [[marine invertebrates]] across the K–Pg boundary. The apparent rate is influenced by the lack of fossil records rather than actual extinction.<ref name="MacLeod"/>

[[Ostracod]]s, a class of small [[crustacean]]s that were prevalent in the upper Maastrichtian, left fossil deposits in a variety of locations. A review of these fossils shows that ostracode diversity was lower in the Paleocene than any other time in the Tertiary. However, current research cannot ascertain whether the extinctions occurred prior to or during the boundary interval itself.<ref>{{cite book |last=Coles|first= GP|coauthors=Ayress MA, and Whatley RC |year=1990 |chapter=A comparison of North Atlantic and 20 Pacific deep-sea Ostracoda |title=Ostracoda and global events |editor=RC Whatley and C Maybury |pages=287–305 |publisher=Chapman & Hall |isbn=978-0-442-31167-4}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |title=Late Maastrichtian and Danian Ostracode Faunas from Northern Alaska: Reconstructions of Environment and Paleogeography |author=Brouwers EM, De Deckker P |year=1993 |journal=Palaios |volume=8 |issue=2 |pages=140–154 |doi=10.2307/3515168 |jstor=3515168}}</ref>

Approximately 60% of late-Cretaceous [[Scleractinia]] [[coral]] genera failed to cross the K–Pg boundary into the Paleocene. Further analysis of the coral extinctions shows that approximately 98% of colonial species, ones that inhabit warm, shallow [[tropical]] waters, became extinct. The solitary corals, which generally do not form reefs and inhabit colder and deeper (below the [[photic zone]]) areas of the ocean were less impacted by the K–Pg boundary. Colonial coral species rely upon [[symbiosis]] with photosynthetic [[algae]], which collapsed due to the events surrounding the K–Pg boundary.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Vescsei A, Moussavian E |title=Paleocene reefs on the Maiella Platform Margin, Italy: An example of the effects of the cretaceous/tertiary boundary events on reefs and carbonate platforms |year=1997 |journal=Facies |volume=36 |issue=1 |pages=123–139 |doi=10.1007/BF02536880}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |author=Rosen BR, Turnšek D |year=1989 |contribution=Extinction patterns and biogeography of scleractinian corals across the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary |title=Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Fossil Cnidaria including Archaeocyatha and Spongiomorphs |journal=Memoir of the Association of Australasian Paleontology |location=Brisbane, Queensland |issue=8 |editor1=Jell A |editor2=Pickett JW |pages=355–370}}</ref> However, the use of data from coral fossils to support K–Pg extinction and subsequent Paleocene recovery must be weighed against the changes that occurred in coral ecosystems through the K–Pg boundary.<ref name="MacLeod"/>

The numbers of [[cephalopod]], [[echinoderm]], and [[bivalve]] genera exhibited significant diminution after the K–Pg boundary.<ref name="MacLeod"/> Most species of [[brachiopods]], a small [[phylum]] of marine invertebrates, survived the K–Pg extinction event and diversified during the early Paleocene.
[[Image:RudistCretaceousUAE.jpg|thumb|left|[[Rudist]] bivalves from the Late Cretaceous of the Omani Mountains, United Arab Emirates. Scale bar is 10&nbsp;mm]]
Except for [[nautiloid]]s (represented by the modern order [[Nautilida]]) and [[coleoid]]s (which had already [[Genetic divergence|diverged]] into modern [[octopus|octopodes]], [[squid]]s, and [[cuttlefish]]) all other species of the [[mollusca]]n class [[Cephalopoda]] became extinct at the K–Pg boundary. These included the ecologically significant [[belemnoidea|belemnoids]], as well as the [[ammonoids]], a group of highly diverse, numerous, and widely distributed shelled cephalopods. Researchers have pointed out that the reproductive strategy of the surviving nautiloids, which rely upon few and larger eggs, played a role in outsurviving their ammonoid counterparts through the extinction event. The ammonoids utilized a planktonic strategy of reproduction (numerous eggs and planktonic larvae), which would have been devastated by the K–Pg extinction event. Additional research has shown that subsequent to this elimination of ammonoids from the global biota, nautiloids began an evolutionary radiation into shell shapes and complexities theretofore known only from ammonoids.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Ward PD, Kennedy WJ, MacLeod KG, Mount JF |year=1991 |title=Ammonite and inoceramid bivalve extinction patterns in Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary sections of the Biscay region (southwestern France, northern Spain) |journal=Geology |volume=19 |issue=12 |pages=1181–1184 |url=http://geology.geoscienceworld.org/cgi/content/abstract/19/12/1181 |doi=10.1130/0091-7613(1991)019<1181:AAIBEP>2.3.CO;2|bibcode = 1991Geo....19.1181W }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |author=Harries PJ, Johnson KR, Cobban WA, Nichols DJ |year=2002 |title=Marine Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary section in southwestern South Dakota: Comment and Reply |journal=Geology |volume=30 |issue=10 |pages=954–955 |doi=10.1130/0091-7613(2002)030<0955:MCTBSI>2.0.CO;2 |issn=0091-7613|bibcode = 2002Geo....30..954H }}</ref>

Approximately 35% of [[echinoderm]] genera became extinct at the K–Pg boundary, although [[taxon|taxa]] that thrived in low-latitude, shallow-water environments during late Cretaceous had the highest extinction rate. Mid-latitude, deep-water echinoderms were much less affected at the K–Pg boundary. The pattern of extinction points to habitat loss, specifically the drowning of [[carbonate platform]]s, the shallow-water reefs in existence at that time, by the extinction event.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Neraudeau D, Thierry J, Moreau P |year=1997 |title=Variation in echinoid biodiversity during the Cenomanian–early Turonian transgressive episode in Charentes (France) |journal=Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France |volume=168 |pages=51–61}}</ref>

Other invertebrate groups, including [[rudists]] (reef-building clams) and [[inoceramus|inoceramids]] (giant relatives of modern [[scallops]]), also became extinct at the K–Pg boundary.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Raup DM and Jablonski D |title=Geography of end-Cretaceous marine bivalve extinctions |journal=Science |year=1993 |volume=260 |issue=5110 |pages=971–973 |doi=10.1126/science.11537491 |pmid=11537491|bibcode = 1993Sci...260..971R }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |author=MacLeod KG |title=Extinction of Inoceramid Bivalves in Maastrichtian Strata of the Bay of Biscay Region of France and Spain |journal=Journal of Paleontology |volume=68 |issue=5 |pages=1048–1066 |year=1994}}</ref>

===Fish===
There are substantial fossil records of [[Gnathostomata|jawed]] [[fish]]es across the K–Pg boundary, which provides good evidence of extinction patterns of these classes of marine vertebrates. Within [[Chondrichthyes|cartilaginous fish]], approximately 80% of the [[shark]]s, [[Rajiformes|rays]], and [[skate]]s families survived the extinction event,<ref name="MacLeod"/> and more than 90% of [[teleostei|teleost fish]] (bony fish) families survived.<ref>{{cite book |last=Patterson|first=C |year=1993 |title=Osteichthyes: Teleostei. In: The Fossil Record 2 (Benton, MJ, editor) |publisher=Springer |pages=621–656 |isbn=0-412-39380-8}}</ref> There is evidence of a mass kill of bony fishes at a fossil site immediately above the K–Pg boundary layer on [[Seymour Island]] near Antarctica, apparently precipitated by the K–Pg extinction event.<ref>{{cite journal |title=Discovery of fish mortality horizon at the K–T boundary on Seymour Island: Re-evaluation of events at the end of the Cretaceous |author=Zinsmeister WJ |date=1 May 1998|url=http://jpaleontol.geoscienceworld.org/cgi/content/abstract/72/3/556?maxtoshow=&HITS=10&hits=10&RESULTFORMAT=1&author1=zinsmeister&andorexacttitle=and&field_name=fulltext&searchid=1&FIRSTINDEX=0&sortspec=relevance&fdate=7/1/1927&tdate=7/31/2007&resourcetype=HWCIT |accessdate=2007-08-27 |journal=Journal of Paleontology |volume=72 |issue=3 |pages=556–571 }}</ref> However, the marine and freshwater environments of fishes mitigated environmental effects of the extinction event.<ref name="Robertson"/>

===Terrestrial invertebrates===
[[Insect]] damage to the fossilized leaves of [[flowering plant]]s from fourteen sites in North America were used as a proxy for insect diversity across the K–Pg boundary and analyzed to determine the rate of extinction. Researchers found that Cretaceous sites, prior to the extinction event, had rich plant and insect-feeding diversity. However, during the early Paleocene, flora were relatively diverse with little predation from insects, even 1.7&nbsp;million years after the extinction event.<ref name="Labandieraetal">{{cite journal| author =Labandeira Conrad C, Johnson Kirk R, Wilf Peter | title =Impact of the terminal Cretaceous event on plant–insect associations| journal =Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America| volume =99| issue =4| pages =2061–2066| year =2002| url =http://www.geosc.psu.edu/~pwilf/LabandeiraJohnsonWilf%202002PNAS.pdf| format=PDF
| doi = 10.1073/pnas.042492999 | pmid =11854501| pmc =122319 |bibcode = 2002PNAS...99.2061L }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |title=Decoupled Plant and Insect Diversity After the End-Cretaceous Extinction |author=Wilf P, Labandeira CC, Johnson KR, Ellis B |year=2006 |journal=Science |volume=313 |issue=5790 |pages=1112–1115 |doi=10.1126/science.1129569 |pmid=16931760|bibcode = 2006Sci...313.1112W }}</ref>

===Terrestrial plants===
There is overwhelming evidence of global disruption of plant communities at the K–Pg boundary.<ref name="Nichols, D. J 2008"/><ref name="Nichols, D. J 2008"/><ref name="Vajdaetal">{{cite journal| author =Vajda Vivi, Raine J Ian, Hollis Christopher J | title =Indication of Global Deforestation at the Cretaceous–Tertiary Boundary by New Zealand Fern Spike | journal =Science | volume =294 | issue =5547| pages =1700–1702| year =2001| url =http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/294/5547/1700 | doi =10.1126/science.1064706 | pmid =11721051|bibcode = 2001Sci...294.1700V }}</ref><ref>Wilf, P. and K. R. Johnson (2004). "Land plant extinction at the end of the Cretaceous: a quantitative analysis of the North Dakota megafloral record." Paleobiology 30(3): 347-368.</ref> Extinctions are seen both in studies of fossil pollen, and fossil leaves.<ref name="Nichols, D. J 2008"/> In North America, the data suggest massive devastation and mass extinction of plants at the K–Pg boundary sections, although there were substantial megafloral changes before the boundary.<ref name="Nichols, D. J 2008"/><ref>{{cite book |last=Johnson|first= KR|coauthors=Hickey LJ |year=1991 |title=Megafloral change across the Cretaceous Tertiary boundary in the northern Great Plains and Rocky Mountains. In: Global Catastrophes in Earth History: An Interdisciplinary Conference on Impacts, Volcanism, and Mass Mortality, Sharpton VI and Ward PD (editors) |publisher=Geological Society of America |isbn=978-0-8137-2247-4}}</ref> In North America, approximately 57% of plant species became extinct. In high southern hemisphere latitudes, such as New Zealand and Antarctica the mass die-off of flora caused no significant turnover in species, but dramatic and short-term changes in the relative abundance of plant groups.<ref name="Labandieraetal"/><ref>{{cite book |last=Askin|first= RA|coauthors=Jacobson SR |year=1996 |title=Palynological change across the Cretaceous–Tertiary boundary on Seymour Island, Antarctica: environmental and depositional factors. In: Cretaceous–Tertiary Mass Extinctions: Biotic and Environmental Changes, Keller G, MacLeod N (editors) |publisher=WW Norton |isbn=978-0-393-96657-2}}</ref> In some regions, Paleocene recovery of plants began with recolonizations by fern species, represented as a [[fern spike]] in the geologic record; this same pattern of fern recolonization was observed after the [[1980 Mount St. Helens eruption]].<ref name="SchultzDhondt">{{cite journal | author =Schultz PH, D'Hondt S| title =Cretaceous–Tertiary (Chicxulub) impact angle and its consequences | journal =Geology | volume =24 | issue =11 | pages =963–967 | year=1996 | url=http://geology.geoscienceworld.org/cgi/content/abstract/24/11/963 | doi =10.1130/0091-7613(1996)024<0963:CTCIAA>2.3.CO;2| id =| accessdate =2007-07-05|bibcode = 1996Geo....24..963S }}</ref> However the patterns of recovery were quite variable. Different fern species were responsible for the fern spike in different areas, and in some regions, no fern spike is evident.

Due to the wholesale destruction of plants at the K–Pg boundary there was a proliferation of [[saprotrophic]] organisms such as [[fungus|fungi]] that do not require [[photosynthesis]] and use nutrients from decaying vegetation. The dominance of fungal species lasted only a few years while the atmosphere cleared and there was plenty of organic matter to feed on. Once the atmosphere cleared, photosynthetic organisms like ferns and other plants returned.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Vajda V, McLoughlin S |year=2004 |title=Fungal Proliferation at the Cretaceous–Tertiary Boundary |journal=Science |url=http://www.geol.lu.se/personal/VIV/Vajda%20&McLoughlin%202004.pdf |format=PDF |volume=303 |pages=1489–1490 |doi=10.1126/science.1093807 |accessdate=2007-07-07 |pmid=15001770 |issue=5663}}</ref> [[Polyploidy]] appears to have enhanced the ability of flowering plants to survive the extinction, probably because the additional copies of the genome such plants possessed allowed them to more readily adapt to the rapidly changing environmental conditions that followed the impact.<ref name='Fawcett2009'>{{cite doi | 10.1073/pnas.0900906106 }}</ref>

===Amphibians===
There is limited evidence for extinction of amphibians at the K–Pg boundary. A study of fossil vertebrates across the K–Pg boundary in Montana concluded that no species of amphibian became extinct.<ref name="Archibald">{{cite journal |author=Archibald JD, Bryant LJ |year=1990 |title=Differential Cretaceous–Tertiary extinction of nonmarine vertebrates; evidence from northeastern Montana. In: Global Catastrophes in Earth History: an Interdisciplinary Conference on Impacts, Volcanism, and Mass Mortality (Sharpton VL and Ward PD, editors) |journal=Geological Society of America, Special Paper |volume=247 |pages=549–562}}</ref> Yet there are several species of Maastrichtian amphibian, not included as part of this study, which are unknown from the Paleocene. These include the frog ''Theatonius lancensis'' <ref>Estes, R. (1964). "Fossil vertebrates from the Late Cretaceous Lance Formation, Eastern Wyoming." University of California Publications, Department of Geological Sciences 49: 1-180.</ref> and the albanerpetontid ''Albanerpeton galaktion'';<ref>Gardner, J. D. (2000). "Albanerpetontid amphibians from the Upper Cretaceous (Campanian and Maastrichtian) of North America." Geodiversitas 22(3): 349-388.</ref> therefore some amphibians do seem to have become extinct at the boundary. The relatively low levels of extinction seen among amphibians probably reflect the low extinction rates seen in freshwater animals.<ref>Sheehan, P. M. and D. E. Fastovsky (1992). "Major extinctions of land-dwelling vertebrates at the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary, Eastern Montana." Geology 20: 556-560.</ref>

===Non-archosaur reptiles===
[[File:Kronosaurus hunt1DB.jpg|thumb|right|Large marine reptiles such as [[mosasaur]]s and [[plesiosaur]]s died out by the end of the Cretaceous.]]

The two living non-[[archosaur]]ian reptile taxa, [[testudines]] (turtles) and [[lepidosaur]]s ([[snake]]s, [[lizard]]s, and [[amphisbaenia]]ns (worm lizards)), along with [[choristodere]]s (semi-aquatic [[archosauromorph]]s that died out in the early [[Miocene]]), survived through the K–Pg boundary.<ref name="MacLeod"/> Over 80% of Cretaceous turtle species passed through the K–Pg boundary. Additionally, all six turtle families in existence at the end of the Cretaceous survived into the Paleogene and are represented by current species.<ref name="Novacek">{{cite journal |title=100&nbsp;Million Years of Land Vertebrate Evolution: The Cretaceous-Early Tertiary Transition |author=Novacek MJ |journal=Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden |volume=86 |issue=2 |year=1999 |pages=230–258 |doi=10.2307/2666178 |jstor=2666178}}</ref> Living lepidosaurs include [[Rhynchocephalia]] ([[tuatara]]s) and [[Squamata]]. The Rhynchocephalia were a widespread and relatively successful group of lepidosaurs in the early Mesozoic, but began to decline by the mid-Cretaceous. They are represented today by a single genus located exclusively in [[Biodiversity of New Zealand|New Zealand]].<ref>{{cite book |last=Lutz|first=D |year=2005 |title = Tuatara: A Living Fossil |publisher=DIMI Press |isbn=0-931625-43-2}}</ref>

The order Squamata, which is represented today by lizards, snakes, and amphisbaenians, radiated into various ecological niches during the [[Jurassic]] and were successful throughout the Cretaceous. They survived through the K–Pg boundary and are currently the most successful and diverse group of living reptiles with more than 6,000 extant species. No known family of terrestrial squamates became extinct at the boundary, and fossil evidence indicates they did not suffer any significant decline in numbers. Their small size, adaptable metabolism, and ability to move to more favorable habitats were key factors in their survivability during the late Cretaceous and early Paleocene.<ref name="MacLeod"/><ref name="Novacek"/> Giant non-archosaurian aquatic reptiles such as [[mosasaur]]s and [[plesiosaur]]s, which were the top marine predators of their time, became extinct by the end of the Cretaceous.<ref name="ChatterjeeSmall">{{cite journal | author=Chatterjee S, Small BJ | title =New plesiosaurs from the Upper Cretaceous of Antarctica| journal =Geological Society, London, Special Publications| volume =47| issue =1| pages =197–215| year =1989| url =http://sp.lyellcollection.org/cgi/content/abstract/47/1/197
| doi = 10.1144/GSL.SP.1989.047.01.15 | accessdate =2007-07-04|bibcode = 1989GSLSP..47..197C }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |author=O'Keefe FR |year=2001 |title=A cladistic analysis and taxonomic revision of the Plesiosauria (Reptilia: Sauropterygia) |journal=Acta Zoologica Fennica |volume=213 |pages=1–63}}</ref> This is most likely due to their size, which meant they were less able to adapt during the aftermath of the extinction event.

===Archosaurs===
The [[archosaur]] clade includes two living orders, [[crocodilia]]ns (of which [[Alligatoridae]], [[Crocodylidae]] and [[Gavialidae]] are the only surviving families) and dinosaurs (of which birds are the sole surviving members), along with the extinct non-avian [[dinosaur]]s and [[pterosaur]]s.

====Crocodyliforms====
Ten families of crocodilians or their close relatives are represented in the Maastrichtian fossil records, of which five died out prior to the K–Pg boundary.<ref>{{cite journal |title=Calibration age and quartet divergence date estimation |author=Brochu CA |year=2004 |journal=Evolution |volume=58 |issue=6 |pages=1375–1382 |doi=10.1554/03-509 |pmid=15266985}}</ref> Five families have both Maastrichtian and Paleocene fossil representatives. All of the surviving families of crocodyliforms inhabited freshwater and terrestrial environments—except for the [[Dyrosauridae]], which lived in freshwater and marine locations. Approximately 50% of crocodyliform representatives survived across the K–Pg boundary, the only apparent trend being that no large crocodiles survived.<ref name="MacLeod"/> Crocodyliform survivability across the boundary may have resulted from their aquatic niche and ability to burrow, which reduced susceptibility to negative environmental effects at the boundary.<ref name="Robertson">{{cite journal |title= Survival in the first hours of the Cenozoic |author=Robertson DS, McKenna MC, Toon OB, Hope S, Lillegraven JA |journal=GSA Bulletin |year=2004 |volume=116 |issue=5–6 |pages=760–768 |doi=10.1130/B25402.1 |url=http://www.ugcs.caltech.edu/~presto/cenozoic.pdf |format=PDF|accessdate=2007-08-31|bibcode = 2004GSAB..116..760R }}</ref> Jouve and colleagues suggested in 2008 that juvenile marine crocodyliforms lived in freshwater environments like modern marine crocodile juveniles, which would have helped them survive where other marine reptiles became extinct; freshwater environments were not as strongly affected by the K–Pg extinction event as marine environments.<ref name=SJetal08>{{cite journal |author=Jouve S, Bardet, N, Jalil N-E, Suberbiola XP, Bouya B, Amaghzaz M|year=2008 |title=The oldest African crocodylian: phylogeny, paleobiogeography, and differential survivorship of marine reptiles through the Cretaceous-Tertiary Boundary |journal=Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology |volume=28 |issue=2 |pages=409–421 |doi=10.1671/0272-4634(2008)28[409:TOACPP]2.0.CO;2 |issn=0272-4634 }}</ref>

The [[Choristodera]], a generally crocodile-like group of uncertain phylogeny (possibly archosaurian) also survived the event, only to go extinct in the Miocene.<ref name=EK05>{{cite journal |last=Evans |first=Susan E. |coauthors=and Klembara, Jozef |year=2005 |title=A choristoderan reptile (Reptilia: Diapsida) from the Lower Miocene of northwest Bohemia (Czech Republic) |journal=Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology |volume=25 |issue=1 |pages=171–184 |doi=10.1671/0272-4634(2005)025[0171:ACRRDF]2.0.CO;2 |issn=0272-4634 }}</ref>

====Pterosaurs====
One family of [[pterosaurs]], [[Azhdarchidae]], was definitely present in the [[Maastrichtian]], and it became extinct at the K–Pg boundary. These large pterosaurs were the last representatives of a declining group that contained 10 families during the mid-Cretaceous. Smaller pterosaurs became extinct prior to the Maastrichtian during a period that saw a decline in smaller animal species while larger species became more prevalent. Recently, several pterosaur taxa have been discovered dating to the [[Campanian]]/Maastrichtian, such as the [[ornithocheirid]]s [[Piksi]] and "[[Ornithocheirus]]", possible [[Pteranodontidae|pteranodontids]] and [[Nyctosauridae|nyctosaurids]], and a [[Tapejaridae|tapejarid]].<ref name="mnhn-piksi">{{citation | url=http://www.mnhn.fr/museum/front/medias/publication/48099_g2012n4a10.pdf | title=Systematic reinterpretation of Piksi barbarulna Varricchio, 2002 from Two Medicine Formation (Upper Cretaceous) of Western USA (Montana) as a pterosaur rather than a bird)) | publisher=Muséum national d'histoire naturelle, Paris | work=Varricchio, D. | year=2012 | accessdate=December 31, 2012 | author=Agnolin, F. L. | pages=891&892|doi=10.5252/g2012n4a10}}</ref> While this was occurring, [[modern birds]] were undergoing diversification and replacing archaic birds and pterosaur groups, possibly due to direct competition, or they simply filled empty niches.<ref name="Robertson"/><ref>{{cite journal |author=Slack KE, Jones CM, Ando T, Harrison GL, Fordyce RE, Arnason U, Penny D |year=2006 |title=Early Penguin Fossils, Plus Mitochondrial Genomes, Calibrate Avian Evolution |journal=Molecular Biology and Evolution |volume=23 |pages=1144–1155 |url=http://mbe.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/23/6/1144
| doi = 10.1093/molbev/msj124 |pmid=16533822 |issue=6 }}</ref><ref name="PennyPhillips">{{cite journal |author=Penny D, Phillips MJ |year=2004 |title=The rise of birds and mammals: are microevolutionary processes sufficient for macroevolution |journal=Trends Ecol Evol |volume=19 |pages=516–522 | doi = 10.1016/j.tree.2004.07.015 |pmid=16701316 |issue=10 }}</ref> However, ecological overlap between birds and pterosaurs seems to have been minimal,<ref>{{Citation | title = Slack et al. (2006)| doi = }}</ref><ref>{{Citation | title = Butler, Barret, Nowbath, Upchurch (2009)| doi = }}</ref><ref>{{Citation | title = Dyke et al. (2009)| doi = }}</ref> and it appears that pterosaur extinction seems to coincide with a bizarre "diversity freeze", with the sudden radiation of species in the [[Lower Cretaceous]] apparently simply ceasing to diversify, leaving them vulnerable to minor extinction events like the [[Cretaceous Thermal Maximum]]<ref>{{Citation | title = ''Pterosaurs: Natural History, Evolution, Anatomy'', Mark P. Wilton (2013)| doi = }}</ref>

====Birds====
Most paleontologists regard birds as the only surviving dinosaurs (see [[Origin of birds]]). However, all non-[[neornithes|neornithean]] birds became extinct, including flourishing groups like [[enantiornithes|enantiornithines]] and [[hesperornithes|hesperornithiforms]].<ref>{{cite journal |author=Hou L, Martin M, Zhou Z, Feduccia A |year=1996 |title=Early Adaptive Radiation of Birds: Evidence from Fossils from Northeastern China |journal=Science |volume=274 |issue=5290 |pages=1164–1167 |doi=10.1126/science.274.5290.1164 |pmid=8895459 |bibcode = 1996Sci...274.1164H }}</ref> Several analyses of bird fossils show divergence of species prior to the K–Pg boundary, and that duck, chicken and [[ratite]] bird relatives coexisted with non-avian dinosaurs.<ref>{{cite journal |title=Definitive fossil evidence for the extant avian radiation in the Cretaceous |author=Clarke JA, Tambussi CP, Noriega JI, Erickson GM, Ketcham RA |year=2005 |journal=Nature |volume=433 |issue=7023 |pages=305–308 |doi=10.1038/nature03150 |pmid=15662422 |bibcode = 2005Natur.433..305C }}</ref> Large collections of bird fossils representing a range of different species provides definitive evidence for the persistence of archaic birds to within 300,000 years of the K–Pg boundary. None of them are known to survive into the Paleogene, and their persistence into the latest Maastrichtian therefore provides strong evidence for a mass extinction of archaic birds coinciding with the Chicxulub asteroid impact. A small fraction of the Cretaceous bird species survived the impact, giving rise to today's birds.<ref name=longrichetal2011>{{cite journal | doi = 10.1073/pnas.1110395108 | last1 = Longrich | first1 = Nicholas R. | last2 = Tokaryk | first2 = Tim | last3 = Field | first3 = Daniel J. | year = 2011 | title = Mass extinction of birds at the Cretaceous–Paleogene (K–Pg) boundary. | url = http://www.pnas.org/content/108/37/15253 | journal = Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences | volume = 108 | issue = 37 | pages = 15253–15257|bibcode = 2011PNAS..10815253L }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/09/110919151315.htm | title = Primitive Birds Shared Dinosaurs' Fate | date = 20 September 2011 | publisher = Science Daily | accessdate= 20 September 2011}}</ref> So far, only a single bird species, which has not been named, has been confidently identified from both above and below the K–Pg boundary (it is present in the Maastrichtian [[Hell Creek Formation]] and Danian [[Fort Union Formation]]).<ref name=longrichetal2011/> The only bird group known for certain to have survived the K–Pg boundary is the [[Neornithine]]s (though one Paleogene species, ''[[Qinornis paleocenica]]'', may represent a surviving non-neornithine bird).<ref name=longrichetal2011/> Neornithines may have been able to survive the extinction as a result of their abilities to dive, swim, or seek shelter in water and marshlands. Many species of neornithines can build burrows, or nest in tree holes or termite nests, all of which provided shelter from the environmental effects at the K–Pg boundary. Long-term survival past the boundary was assured as a result of filling ecological niches left empty by extinction of non-avian dinosaurs.<ref name="Robertson"/>

====Non-avian dinosaurs====
[[Image:Tyrannosaurus Rex Holotype.jpg|thumb|''[[Tyrannosaurus]]'' was one of the last dinosaurs to live on Earth before the extinction.]]
Excluding a few controversial claims, scientists agree that all non-avian dinosaurs became extinct at the K–Pg boundary. The dinosaur fossil record has been interpreted to show both a decline in diversity and no decline in diversity during the last few million years of the Cretaceous, and it may be that the quality of the dinosaur fossil record is simply not good enough to permit researchers to distinguish between the options.<ref name=AF04>{{cite book |first=Archibald|last=David|coauthors=David Fastovsky|editor=Weishampel David B, Dodson Peter, Osmólska Halszka (eds.) |title=The Dinosauria |edition=2nd |year=2004 |publisher=University of California Press |location=Berkeley |isbn=0-520-24209-2 |pages=672–684 |chapter=Dinosaur Extinction |chapterurl=http://www.bio.sdsu.edu/faculty/archibald/ArchFast.pdf }}</ref> Since there is no evidence that late Maastrichtian nonavian dinosaurs could burrow, swim or dive, they were unable to shelter themselves from the worst parts of any environmental stress that occurred at the K–Pg boundary. It is possible that small dinosaurs (other than birds) did survive, but they would have been deprived of food as both herbivorous dinosaurs would have found plant material scarce, and carnivores would have quickly found prey in short supply.<ref name="Robertson"/>

The growing consensus about the endothermy of dinosaurs (see [[physiology of dinosaurs|dinosaur physiology]]) helps to understand their full extinction in contrast with their close relatives, the [[crocodilians]]. Ectothermic ("cold-blooded") crocodiles have very limited needs for food (they can survive several months without eating) while endothermic ("warm-blooded") animals of similar size need much more food to sustain their faster metabolism. Thus, under the circumstances of food chain disruption previously mentioned, non-avian dinosaurs died,<ref name="autogenerated347"/> while some crocodiles survived. In this context, the survival of other endothermic animals, such as some birds and mammals, could be due, among other reasons, to their smaller needs for food, related to their small size at the extinction epoch.<ref name="springerlink.com">{{cite book |last=Ocampo|first=A|coauthors=Vajda V, Buffetaut E |chapter=Unravelling the Cretaceous–Paleogene (K–T) turnover, evidence from flora, fauna and geology in biological processes associated with impact events |editor=Cockell C, Gilmour I, Koeberl C |title=Biological Processes Associated with Impact Events |publisher=SpringerLink |year=2006 |pages=197–219 |isbn=978-3-540-25735-6|url=http://www.springerlink.com/content/vw75014157p2p278/}}</ref>

Whether the extinction occurred gradually or very suddenly has been debated, as both views have support in the fossil record. A study of 29&nbsp;fossil sites in Catalan [[Pyrenees]] of Europe in 2010 supports that dinosaurs there had great diversity until the asteroid impact, with over 100 living species.<ref>{{cite journal
|author=Rieraa V, Marmib J, Omsa O, Gomez B
|title=Orientated plant fragments revealing tidal palaeocurrents in the Fumanya mudflat (Maastrichtian, southern Pyrenees): Insights in palaeogeographic reconstructions
|journal=Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology
|volume=288
|issue=1–4
|pages=82–92
|year=2010
|month=March
|pmid=
|doi=10.1016/j.palaeo.2010.01.037
|url=
}}</ref> However, more recent research indicates that this figure is obscured by taphonomical biases and the scarcity of the continental fossil record. The results of this study, which were based on estimated real global biodiversity, showed that between 628 and 1078 non-avian dinosaur species were alive at the end of the [[Cretaceous]] and underwent sudden extinction after the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event.<ref>Loeuff Le , J.(2012) Paleobiogeography and biodiversity of Late Maastrichtian dinosaurs: how many dinosaur species went extinct at the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary? Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France 183(6): 547-559 doi: 10.2113/gssgfbull.183.6.547</ref> Alternatively, interpretation based on the fossil bearing rocks along the [[Red Deer River]] in Alberta, Canada, supports the gradual extinction of non-avian dinosaurs; during the last 10&nbsp;million years of the Cretaceous layers there, the number of dinosaur species seems to have decreased from about 45 to about 12. Other scientists have pointed out the same.<ref>{{cite journal
|author=Ryan MJ, Russell AP, Eberth DA, Currie PJ
|title=The taphonomy of a Centrosaurus (Ornithischia: Ceratopsidae) bone bed from the Dinosaur Park Formation (Upper Campanian), Alberta, Canada, with comments on cranial ontogeny
|journal=PALAIOS
|volume=16
|issue=
|pages=482–506
|year=2001
|month=
|pmid=
|doi=
|url=http://www.biology.ualberta.ca/faculty/philip_currie/uploads/pdfs/2001/2001Centrosaurus.pdf
}}</ref>

Several researchers support the existence of [[Paleocene dinosaurs]]. Evidence of this existence is based on the discovery of dinosaur remains in the [[Hell Creek]] Formation up to {{convert|1.3|m|ft|1|abbr=on}} above and {{val|40000|u=years}} later than the K–Pg boundary.<ref name="Sloan">{{cite journal |author=Sloan RE, Rigby K, Van Valen LM, Gabriel Diane |year=1986 |title=Gradual dinosaur extinction and simultaneous ungulate radiation in the Hell Creek formation |journal=Science |volume=232 |issue=4750 |pages=629–633 |url=http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/232/4750/629 |doi= 10.1126/science.232.4750.629|accessdate=2007-05-18 |pmid=17781415|bibcode = 1986Sci...232..629S }}</ref> Pollen samples recovered near a fossilized [[hadrosaur]] [[femur]] recovered in the Ojo Alamo Sandstone at the [[San Juan River (Colorado River)|San Juan River]] indicate that the animal lived during the Tertiary, approximately {{val|64.5|u=Ma}} (about 1&nbsp;million years after the K–Pg extinction event). If their existence past the K–Pg boundary can be confirmed, these hadrosaurids would be considered a [[Dead Clade Walking]].<ref name="Fassett">{{cite journal |url=http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/impact2000/pdf/3139.pdf |format=PDF |title=Compelling new evidence for Paleocene dinosaurs in the Ojo Alamo Sandstone San Juan Basin, New Mexico and Colorado, USA |author=Fassett JE, Lucas SG, Zielinski RA, Budahn JR |year=2001 |journal=International Conference on Catastrophic Events and Mass Extinctions: Impacts and Beyond, 9–12 July 2000, Vienna, Austria |volume=1053 |pages=45–46 |accessdate=2007-05-18}}</ref> Scientific consensus is that these fossils were eroded from their original locations and then re-buried in much later sediments (also known as reworked fossils).<ref name="Sullivan">{{cite journal |author=Sullivan RM |title=No Paleocene dinosaurs in the San Juan Basin, New Mexico |url=http://gsa.confex.com/gsa/2003RM/finalprogram/abstract_47695.htm |journal=Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs |volume=35 |issue=5 |page=15 |year=2003 |accessdate=2007-07-02}}</ref>
[[Image:Hell Creek.jpg|thumb|Hell Creek formation]]

===Mammals===
All major Cretaceous [[mammal]]ian lineages, including [[monotreme]]s (egg-laying mammals), [[multituberculata|multituberculates]], [[marsupial]]s and [[Eutheria|placentals]], [[dryolestoidea]]ns,<ref>{{cite journal|author=Gelfo JN and Pascual R|year=2001|title=''Peligrotherium tropicalis'' (Mammalia, Dryolestida) from the early Paleocene of Patagonia, a survival from a Mesozoic Gondwanan radiation|journal=Geodiversitas|volume=23|pages=369–379|url=http://www.mnhn.fr/publication/geodiv/g01n3a4.pdf }}</ref> and [[gondwanatheria|gondwanatheres]]<ref>{{cite journal|author=Goin FJ, Reguero MA, Pascual R, von Koenigswald W, Woodburne MO, Case JA, Marenssi SA, Vieytes C, Vizcaíno SF|year=2006|title=First gondwanatherian mammal from Antarctica|journal=Geological Society, London, Special Publications|volume=258|pages=135–144|doi=10.1144/GSL.SP.2006.258.01.10|bibcode = 2006GSLSP.258..135G }}</ref> survived the K–Pg extinction event, although they suffered losses. In particular, marsupials largely disappeared from North America, and the Asian [[deltatheroida]]ns, primitive relatives of extant marsupials, became extinct.<ref name=classofmamm>{{cite book|last=McKenna|first= MC|coauthors=Bell SK|title=Classification of mammals: above the species level|publisher=Columbia University Press|year=1997|isbn=978-0-231-11012-9}}</ref><!--Only peradectids and herpetotheriids remained (and ''Esteslestes'', affinities unclear); stagodontids, pediomyoids and some other stuff became extinct. There are 17 Late Cretaceous (more have since been described) and 3 Paleocene North American marsupials in McKenna and Bell--> In the Hell Creek beds of North America, at least half of the ten known multituberculate species and all eleven marsupial species are not found above the boundary.<ref name=AF04/>

Mammalian species began diversifying approximately 30&nbsp;million years prior to the K–Pg boundary. Diversification of mammals stalled across the boundary.<ref name="Bininda-Emonds">{{cite journal |title=The delayed rise of present-day mammals|author=Bininda-Emonds ORP, Cardillo M, Jones KE, MacPhee RDE, Beck RMD, Grenyer R, Price SA, Vos RA, Gittleman JLY, Purvis A |journal=Nature |volume=446 |pages=507–512 |year=2007 |doi=10.1038/nature05634 |url=http://www.uni-oldenburg.de/molekularesystematik/download/Publications/mammalST.pdf|format=PDF |pmid=17392779 |issue=7135 |bibcode=2007Natur.446..507B}}</ref>
Current research indicates that mammals did not explosively diversify across the K–Pg boundary, despite the environment niches made available by the extinction of dinosaurs.<ref name="Springer">{{cite journal |title=Placental mammal diversification and the Cretaceous–Tertiary boundary |url=http://www.pnas.org/cgi/reprint/100/3/1056.pdf |format=PDF |year=2003 |author=Springer MS, Murphy WJ, Eizirik E, O'Brien SJ |journal=PNAS |volume=100 |issue=3 |pages=1056–1061 |doi=10.1073/pnas.0334222100 |pmid=12552136 |pmc=298725|bibcode = 2003PNAS..100.1056S }}</ref> Several mammalian orders have been interpreted as diversifying immediately after the K–Pg boundary, including [[Chiroptera]] (bats) and [[Cetartiodactyla]] (a diverse group that today includes [[cetaceans|whales and dolphins]] and [[even-toed ungulate]]s),<ref name="Springer"/> although recent research concludes that only [[marsupial]] orders diversified after the K–Pg boundary.<ref name="Bininda-Emonds"/>

K–Pg boundary mammalian species were generally small, comparable in size to [[rat]]s; this small size would have helped them to find shelter in protected environments. In addition, it is postulated that some early monotremes, marsupials, and placentals were semiaquatic or burrowing, as there are multiple mammalian lineages with such habits today. Any burrowing or semiaquatic mammal would have had additional protection from K–Pg boundary environmental stresses.<ref name="Robertson"/>

==Evidence==

===North American fossils===
In North American terrestrial sequences, the extinction event is best represented by the marked discrepancy between the rich and relatively abundant late-Maastrichtian [[palynomorph]] record and the post-boundary fern spike.<ref name="Vajdaetal"/>

At present the most informative sequence of dinosaur-bearing rocks in the world from the K–Pg boundary is found in western North America, particularly the late [[Maastrichtian]]-age [[Hell Creek Formation]] of Montana, US. This formation, when compared with the older (approximately 75&nbsp;Ma) [[Judith River Formation|Judith River]]/[[Dinosaur Park Formation]]s (from Montana, USA, and Alberta, Canada, respectively) provides information on the changes in dinosaur populations over the last 10&nbsp;million years of the Cretaceous. These fossil beds are geographically limited, covering only part of one continent.<ref name=AF04/>

The middle–late Campanian formations show a greater diversity of dinosaurs than any other single group of rocks. The late Maastrichtian rocks contain the largest members of several major clades: ''[[Tyrannosaurus]]'', ''[[Ankylosaurus]]'', ''[[Pachycephalosaurus]]'', ''[[Triceratops]]'' and ''[[Torosaurus]]'',<ref name="Dodson">{{cite book | last = Dodson|first= Peter| authorlink =Peter Dodson | title = The Horned Dinosaurs: A Natural History| publisher = Princeton University Press | year = 1996| location = Princeton | pages = 279–281| isbn = 0-691-05900-4}}</ref> which suggests food was plentiful immediately prior to the extinction.

In addition to rich dinosaur fossils, there are also plant fossils that illustrate the reduction in plant species across the K–Pg boundary. In the sediments below the K–Pg boundary the dominant plant remains are [[angiosperm]] pollen grains, but the actual boundary layer contains little pollen and is dominated by fern spores.<ref name="USGS">{{cite web | title =Online guide to the continental Cretaceous–Tertiary boundary in the Raton basin, Colorado and New Mexico | publisher =U.S. Geological Survey | year=2004| url=http://esp.cr.usgs.gov/info/kt/stop2b.html | doi = | accessdate =2007-07-08}}</ref> Normal pollen levels gradually resume above the boundary layer. This is reminiscent of areas blighted by modern volcanic eruptions, where the recovery is led by ferns, which are later replaced by larger angiosperm plants.<ref>{{cite book|last=Smathers|first=GA|coauthors=Mueller-Dombois D |year=1974 |title=Invasion and Recovery of Vegetation after a Volcanic Eruption in Hawaii, Scientific Monograph Number 5 |publisher=United States National Park Service |url=http://www.nps.gov/history/history/online_books/science/5/contents.htm |accessdate=2007-07-09}}</ref>

===Marine fossils===
The mass extinction of marine plankton appears to have been abrupt and right at the K–Pg boundary.<ref name="Pope">{{cite journal |author=Pope KO, D'Hondt SL, Marshall CR |year=1998 |url=http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/95/19/11028 | doi = 10.1073/pnas.95.19.11028 |title=Meteorite impact and the mass extinction of species at the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary |journal=PNAS |volume=95 |issue=19 |pages=11028–11029 |pmid=9736679 |pmc=33889|bibcode = 1998PNAS...9511028P }}</ref> [[Ammonite]] genera became extinct at or near the K–Pg boundary; however, there was a smaller and slower extinction of ammonite genera prior to the boundary that was associated with a late Cretaceous marine regression. The gradual extinction of most inoceramid bivalves began well before the K–Pg boundary, and a small, gradual reduction in ammonite diversity occurred throughout the very late Cretaceous.<ref name="Marshall">{{cite journal |author=Marshall CR, Ward PD |year=1996 |title=Sudden and Gradual Molluscan Extinctions in the Latest Cretaceous of Western European Tethys |journal=Science |volume=274 |issue=5291 |pages=1360–1363 |doi=10.1126/science.274.5291.1360 |pmid=8910273|bibcode = 1996Sci...274.1360M }}</ref> Further analysis shows that several processes were in progress in the late Cretaceous seas and partially overlapped in time, then ended with the abrupt mass extinction.<ref name="Marshall"/>

===Megatsunamis===
The scientific consensus is that bolide impact at the K–Pg boundary left tsunami deposits and sediments around the area of the Caribbean Sea and Gulf of Mexico.<ref>{{cite book |author=Bourgeois J|chapter=Chapter 3. GEOLOGIC EFFECTS AND RECORDS OF TSUNAMIS|title=The Sea, Volume 15: Tsunamis (Sea: Ideas and Observations on Progress in the Study of the Seas)|publisher=Harvard University|editors=Robinson, A.R. and Bernard, E.N. |location=Boston |year=2009 |pages= |isbn=978-0674031739 |oclc= |doi= |url=http://faculty.washington.edu/jbourgeo/BourgeoisTheSeaCh3.pdf|format=pdf|accessdate=2012-03-29}}</ref> These deposits have been identified in the La Popa basin in northeastern [[Mexico]],<ref>{{cite journal|author=Lawton, T. F., K. W. Shipley, J. L. Aschoff, K. A. Giles and F. J.Vega|year=2005|title=Basinward transport of Chicxulub ejecta by tsunami-induced backflow, La Popa basin, northeastern Mexico, and its implications for distribution of impact-related deposits flanking the Gulf of Mexico|journal=Geology|volume=33|pages=81–84|doi=10.1130/G21057.1|url=http://geology.gsapubs.org/content/33/2/81.abstract|accessdate=2012-03-29|issue=2|bibcode = 2005Geo....33...81L }}</ref> [[platform carbonate]]s in northeastern Brazil,<ref>{{cite journal|author=Albertão, G. A. and P. P. Martins Jr.|year=1996|title=A possible tsunami deposit at the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary in Pernambuco, northeastern Brazil|journal=Sed. Geol.|volume=104|pages=189–201|doi=10.1016/0037-0738(95)00128-X|bibcode = 1996SedG..104..189A }}</ref> and Atlantic deep-sea sediments.<ref>{{cite journal|author=Norris, R. D., J. Firth, J. S. Blusztajn and G. Ravizza|year=2000|title=Mass failure of the North Atlantic margin triggered by the Cretaceous-Paleogene bolide impact|journal=Geology|volume=28|pages=1119–1122|url=http://geology.gsapubs.org/content/28/12/1119.abstract|accessdate=2012-03-29|doi=10.1130/0091-7613(2000)28<1119:MFOTNA>2.0.CO;2|issue=12|bibcode = 2000Geo....28.1119N }}</ref>

==Duration==
The length of time taken for the extinction to occur is a controversial issue, because some theories about the extinction's causes require a rapid extinction over a relatively short period (from a few years to a few thousand years) while others require longer periods. The issue is difficult to resolve because of the [[Signor–Lipps effect]]; that is, the fossil record is so incomplete that most extinct species probably died out long after the most recent fossil that has been found.<ref>{{cite book | url=http://www.bechberger.com/Mel/Signor%20Lipps%20Paper.pdf | title=Geological implications of impacts of large asteroids and comets on the Earth | publisher=Geological Society of America | year=1982 | contribution=Sampling bias, gradual extinction patterns, and catastrophes in the fossil record. | volume=Special Publication 190 | location=Boulder, Colorado | pages=291–296 | oclc=4434434112 | last2=Lipps | first2=JH | last1=Signor III | first1=PW | editor=Silver LT | editor2=Schultz PH (editors)}}</ref> Scientists have also found very few continuous beds of fossil-bearing rock which cover a time range from several million years before the K–Pg extinction to a few million years after it.<ref name="MacLeod"/>

==Chicxulub asteroid impact==
{{Main|Cretaceous–Paleogene boundary|Alvarez hypothesis|Chicxulub crater}}
[[File:Chicxulub impact - artist impression.jpg|thumb|Artist's impression of an asteroid striking Earth at the end of the Cretaceous]]

===Evidence for impact===
In 1980, a team of researchers consisting of [[Nobel prize]]-winning physicist [[Luis Walter Alvarez|Luis Alvarez]], his son geologist [[Walter Alvarez]], and chemists [[Frank Asaro]] and [[Helen Michel]] discovered that [[sedimentary]] layers found all over the world at the Cretaceous–Paleogene boundary contain a [[concentration]] of [[iridium]] many times greater than normal (30, 160 and 20 times in three sections originally studied). Iridium is extremely rare in [[crust (geology)|Earth's crust]] because it is a [[Goldschmidt classification#Siderophile_elements|siderophile element]], and therefore most of it travelled with the [[iron]] as it sank into [[Structure of the Earth#Core|Earth's core]] during [[planetary differentiation]]. As iridium remains abundant in most [[asteroid]]s and [[comet]]s, the Alvarez team suggested that an asteroid struck the Earth at the time of the K–Pg boundary.<ref name="Alvarez">{{cite journal|title=Extraterrestrial cause for the Cretaceous–Tertiary extinction |author=Alvarez LW, Alvarez W, Asaro F, Michel HV |year=1980 |journal=Science |volume=208 |issue=4448 |pages=1095–1108 |doi=10.1126/science.208.4448.1095 |pmid=17783054 |bibcode=1980Sci...208.1095A}}</ref> There were earlier speculations on the possibility of an [[impact event]], but this was the first hard evidence of an impact.<ref>{{cite journal |author=De Laubenfels MW |title=Dinosaur extinction: One more hypothesis |journal=Journal of Paleontology |pages=207–218 |year=1956 |volume=30 |issue=1 |jstor=1300393 }}</ref>

[[File:Trinlake2a.jpg|thumb|The K–Pg boundary exposure in [[Trinidad Lake State Park]], in the [[Raton Basin]] of [[Colorado]], shows an abrupt change from dark- to light-colored rock. White line added to mark the transition.]]
This hypothesis was viewed as radical when first proposed, but additional evidence soon emerged. The boundary clay was found to be full of minute spherules of rock, crystallized from droplets of molten rock formed during by the impact.<ref>Smit, J. and J. Klaver (1981). "Sanidine spherules at the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary indicate a large impact event." Nature 292: 47-49.</ref> [[Shocked quartz]] and other minerals were also identified in the K–Pg boundary.<ref>Bohor, B. F., E. E. Foord, et al. (1984). "Mineralogic evidence for an impact event at the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary." Science 867: 869.</ref><ref>Bohor, B. F., P. J. Modreski, et al. (1987). "Shocked Quartz in the Cretaceous-Tertiary Boundary Clays: Evidence for a Global Distribution." Science 236(4802): 705-709.</ref> Shocked minerals have their internal structure deformed, and are created by intense pressures such as those associated with nuclear blasts or meteorite impacts. The identification of giant [[Tsunami deposit|tsunami beds]] along the Gulf Coast and the Caribbean also provided evidence for impact,<ref>Bourgeois, J., T. A. Hansen, et al. (1988). "A tsunami deposit at the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary in Texas." Science 241(4865): 567-570.</ref> and suggested that the impact may have occurred nearby- as did the fact that the K–Pg boundary became thicker in the southern United States, with meter-thick beds of debris occurring in northern New Mexico.<ref name="Nichols, D. J 2008"/>

{{Blakey_65moll.jpg_K/T_impact_site}}
[[Image:Chicxulub radar topography.jpg|thumb|Radar topography reveals the {{convert|180|km|0|abbr=on|adj=mid|-wide}} ring of the [[Chicxulub Crater]].]]
Further research identified the giant Chicxulub crater, buried under [[Chicxulub, Yucatán|Chicxulub]] on the coast of [[Yucatán]], Mexico as the source of the K–Pg boundary clay. Identified in 1990<ref name="Hildebrand, A. R. 1991"/> based on work by Glen Penfield 1978, the crater is oval, with an average diameter of roughly {{convert|180|km}}, about the size calculated by the Alvarez team.<ref>{{cite journal | author=Pope KO, Ocampo AC, Kinsland GL, Smith R | title=Surface expression of the Chicxulub crater | journal=[[Geology (journal)| ]] | volume=24 | issue=6 | year=1996 | pages=527–530 | pmid=11539331 | doi=10.1130/0091-7613(1996)024<0527:SEOTCC>2.3.CO;2|bibcode = 1996Geo....24..527P }}</ref> The discovery of the crater – a necessary prediction of the impact hypothesis – provided conclusive evidence for a K–Pg impact, and strengthened the hypothesis that the extinction was caused by an impact.

In 2007, a hypothesis was put forth that argued the impactor that killed the dinosaurs belonged to the [[Baptistina family]] of asteroids.<ref name=bottke2007>{{cite journal
|author=Bottke WF, Vokrouhlický D, Nesvorný D
|title=An asteroid breakup 160 Myr ago as the probable source of the K/T impactor
|journal=Nature
|volume=449
|issue=7158
|pages=48–53
|year=2007
|month=September
|pmid=17805288
|doi=10.1038/nature06070
|url=
|bibcode=2007Natur.449...48B
}}</ref> Concerns have been raised regarding the reputed link, in part because very few solid observational constraints exist of the asteroid or family.<ref name=majaess2008>{{cite journal
|author=Majaess DJ, Higgins D, Molnar LA, Haegert MJ, Lane DJ, Turner DG, Nielsen I
|title=New Constraints on the Asteroid 298 Baptistina, the Alleged Family Member of the K/T Impactor
|journal=The Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society of Canada
|volume=103
|issue=1
|pages=7–10
|year=2009
|month=February
|pmid=
|doi=
|url=http://www.rasc.ca/journal/pdfs/2009-02-lr.pdf
|bibcode = 2009JRASC.103....7M |arxiv = 0811.0171 }}</ref> Indeed, it was recently discovered that 298 Baptistina does not share the same chemical signature as the source of the K–Pg impact.<ref name=reddy2008>{{cite journal
|author=Reddy V, Emery JP, Gaffey, MJ, Bottke, WF, Cramer A, Kelley MS
|title=Composition of 298 Baptistina: Implications for the K/T impactor link
|journal=Meteoritics & Planetary Science
|volume=44
|issue=12
|pages=1917–1927
|year=2009
|month=December
|pmid=
|doi=10.1111/j.1945-5100.2009.tb02001.x
|url=
|bibcode = 2009M&PS...44.1917R }}</ref> Although this finding may make the link between the Baptistina family and K–Pg impactor more difficult to substantiate, it does not preclude the possibility.<ref name=reddy2008/> A 2011 [[Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer|WISE]] study of reflected light from the asteroids of the family estimated the break-up at 80&nbsp;Ma, giving it insufficient time to shift orbits and impact the Earth by 66&nbsp;Ma.<ref>{{cite news|title=NASA's WISE Raises Doubt About Asteroid Family Believed Responsible for Dinosaur Extinction|url=http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/09/110919144042.htm|accessdate=21 September 2011|newspaper=ScienceDaily|date=20 September 2011}}</ref>

[[Paul Renne]] of the [[Berkeley Geochronology Center]] has reported that the date of the asteroid event is {{val|66.043|0.011}} million years ago, based on [[argon&ndash;argon dating]]. He further posits that the mass extinction occurred within 33,000 years of this date.<ref name="Renne2013" /><ref>David Perlman, [http://www.sfgate.com/science/article/Dinosaur-extinction-battle-flares-4261978.php "Dinosaur extinction battle flares,"] accessed 2013-02-08</ref>

===Effects of impact===
Such an impact would have inhibited photosynthesis by generating a dust cloud that blocked sunlight for a year or less, and by injecting [[sulfuric acid]] [[aerosol]]s into the [[stratosphere]], which would have reduced sunlight reaching the Earth's surface by 10–20%. It would take at least ten years for those aerosols to dissipate, which would account for the extinction of [[plant]]s and [[phytoplankton]], and of [[organisms]] dependent on them (including [[predator|predatory animals]] as well as [[herbivores]]). Small creatures whose food chains were based on [[detritus]] would have a reasonable chance of survival.<ref name="springerlink.com"/><ref name="Pope"/> The consequences of reentry of ejecta into Earth's atmosphere would include a brief (hours long) but intense pulse of [[infrared|infrared radiation]], killing exposed organisms.<ref name=Robertson/> Global [[firestorm]]s likely resulted from the heat pulse and the fall back to Earth of incendiary fragments from the blast. Recent research indicates that the
global debris layer deposited by the impact contained enough soot to suggest that the entire terrestrial biosphere had burned.<ref>Robertson, D.S., Lewis, W.M., Sheehan, P.M. & Toon, O.B. (2013) K/Pg Extinction: Re-evaluation of the Heat/Fire Hypothesis.Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences</ref> The high {{chem|O|2}} levels during the late Cretaceous would have supported intense combustion. The level of atmospheric {{chem|O|2}} plummeted in the early Tertiary Period. If widespread fires occurred, they would have increased the {{chem|CO|2}} content of the atmosphere and caused a temporary [[greenhouse effect]] once the dust cloud settled, and this would have exterminated the most vulnerable organisms that survived the period immediately after the impact.<ref>{{cite journal|title=Energy, volatile production, and climatic effects of the Chicxulub Cretaceous/Tertiary impact |author=Pope KO, Baines KH, Ocampo AC, Ivanov BA |year=1997 |journal=Journal of Geophysical Research |volume=102 |issue=E9 |pages=21645–21664 |url=http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/1997/97JE01743.shtml |doi=10.1029/97JE01743|pmid=11541145 |bibcode=1997JGR...10221645P}}</ref>

The impact may also have produced [[acid rain]], depending on what type of rock the asteroid struck. However, recent research suggests this effect was relatively minor, lasting for approximately {{val|12|u=years}}.<ref name="Pope"/> The acidity was [[Buffer solution|neutralized]] by the environment, and the survival of animals vulnerable to acid rain effects (such as [[frog]]s) indicate this was not a major contributor to extinction. Impact theories can only explain very rapid extinctions, since the dust clouds and possible sulfuric aerosols would wash out of the atmosphere in a fairly short time—possibly within {{val|10|u=years}}.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Kring DA |year=2003 |title=Environmental consequences of impact cratering events as a function of ambient conditions on Earth |journal=Astrobiology |volume=3 |issue=1 |pages=133–152 |pmid=12809133 |doi=10.1089/153110703321632471|bibcode = 2003AsBio...3..133K }}</ref>

The shape and location of the crater indicate further causes of devastation in addition to the dust cloud. The asteroid landed in the ocean and would have caused [[megatsunami]]s, for which evidence has been found in several locations in the Caribbean and eastern United States—marine sand in locations that were then inland, and vegetation debris and terrestrial rocks in marine sediments dated to the time of the impact. The asteroid landed in a bed of [[gypsum]] ([[calcium sulfate]]), which would have produced a vast sulfur dioxide [[aerosol]]. This would have further reduced the sunlight reaching the Earth's surface and then precipitated as acid rain, killing vegetation, plankton, and organisms that build shells from [[calcium carbonate]] ([[coccolithophore]]s and [[mollusca|molluscs]]). In February 2008, a team of researchers used seismic images of the crater to determine that the impactor landed in deeper water than was previously assumed. They argued that this would have resulted in increased sulfate aerosols in the atmosphere, which could have made the impact deadlier by altering climate and by generating acid rain.<ref>{{cite journal|title=Importance of pre-impact crustal structure for the asymmetry of the Chicxulub impact crater|author=Gulick|journal=Nature Geoscience |volume=1 |pages=131–135 |date=13 January 2008 | doi=10.1038/ngeo103|last2=Barton|first2=Penny J.|last3=Christeson|first3=Gail L.|last4=Morgan|first4=Joanna V.|last5=McDonald|first5=Matthew|last6=Mendoza-Cervantes|first6=Keren|last7=Pearson|first7=Zulmacristina F.|last8=Surendra|first8=Anusha|last9=Urrutia-Fucugauchi|first9=Jaime |issue=2|bibcode = 2008NatGe...1..131G }}</ref>

Most paleontologists now agree that an asteroid did hit the Earth at approximately the end of the Cretaceous, but there is an ongoing dispute whether the impact was the sole cause of the extinctions.<ref name="Keller"/><ref name="Morgan">{{cite journal |title=Analyses of shocked quartz at the global K-P boundary indicate an origin from a single, high-angle, oblique impact at Chicxulub |author=Morgan J, Lana C, Kersley A, Coles B, Belcher C, Montanari S, Diaz-Martinez E, Barbosa A, Neumann V |journal=Earth and Planetary Science Letters |volume=251 |issue=3–4 |year=2006 |pages=264–279 |doi=10.1016/j.epsl.2006.09.009 |bibcode=2006E&PSL.251..264M}}</ref> There is evidence that there was an interval of about {{val|300|ul=ka}} from the impact to the mass extinction.<ref name="Keller_2009">{{cite journal| author=Keller G, Abramovich S, Berner Z, Adatte T| journal=Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology| volume=271| issue=1–2| date=1 January 2009| pages=52–68| title=Biotic effects of the Chicxulub impact, K–Pg catastrophe and sea level change in Texas| doi=10.1016/j.palaeo.2008.09.007}}</ref> In 1997, paleontologist [[Sankar Chatterjee]] drew attention to the proposed and much larger {{convert|600|km|abbr=on}} [[Shiva crater]] and the possibility of a multiple-impact scenario.

In {{date|March 2010}} an international panel of scientists endorsed the asteroid hypothesis, specifically the Chicxulub impact, as being the cause of the extinction. A team of 41 scientists reviewed {{val|20|u=years}} of scientific literature and in so doing also ruled out other theories such as massive volcanism. They had determined that a {{convert|10|to|15|km|mi|adj=on}} space rock hurtled into Earth at [[Chicxulub, Yucatán|Chicxulub]] on Mexico's [[Yucatan Peninsula]]. The collision would have released the same energy as {{convert|100|TtTNT|ZJ|lk=on}}, over a billion times the energy of the bombs dropped on [[Nagasaki and Hiroshima]].<ref name="Schulte10"/>

==Alternative hypotheses==
The fact that the extinctions occur at the same time as the Chicxulub asteroid impact strongly supports the impact hypothesis of extinction. However, some scientists continue to dispute the role of the Chicxulub impact in driving the extinction, and to suggest that other events may have contributed to the end-Cretaceous mass extinction. In particular, volcanic eruptions, climate change, sea level change, and other impact events have been suggested to play a role in driving the K–Pg extinction.

===Deccan Traps===
<!-- This section is linked from [[Cretaceous-Paleogene extinction event]] -->
{{Main|Deccan Traps}}

Before 2000, arguments that the [[Deccan Traps]] [[flood basalt]]s caused the extinction were usually linked to the view that the extinction was gradual, as the flood basalt events were thought to have started around {{val|68|ul=Ma}} and lasted more than {{val|2|u=million years}}. The most recent evidence shows that the traps erupted over a period of {{val|800000|u=years}} spanning the K–Pg boundary, and therefore may be responsible for the extinction and the delayed biotic recovery thereafter.<ref>{{cite journal |author= Keller G, Adatte T, Gardin S, Bartolini A, Bajpai S |title=Main Deccan volcanism phase ends near the K–T boundary: Evidence from the Krishna-Godavari Basin, SE India |year=2008|doi=10.1016/j.epsl.2008.01.015 |journal=Earth and Planetary Science Letters |volume=268 |pages=293–311 |bibcode=2008E&PSL.268..293K |issue= 3–4}}</ref>

The Deccan Traps could have caused extinction through several mechanisms, including the release of dust and sulfuric aerosols into the air, which might have blocked sunlight and thereby reduced photosynthesis in plants. In addition, Deccan Trap volcanism might have resulted in carbon dioxide emissions that increased the [[greenhouse effect]] when the dust and aerosols cleared from the atmosphere.<ref name="Duncan">{{cite journal |title=Rapid eruption of the Deccan flood basalts at the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary |author=Duncan RA, Pyle DG |year=1988 |journal=Nature |volume=333 |pages=841–843 |doi=10.1038/333841a0 |issue=6176|bibcode = 1988Natur.333..841D }}</ref>

In the years when the Deccan Traps hypothesis was linked to a slower extinction, Luis Alvarez (who died in 1988) replied that [[paleontologists]] were being misled by [[Signor-Lipps effect|sparse data]]. While his assertion was not initially well-received, later intensive field studies of fossil beds lent weight to his claim. Eventually, most paleontologists began to accept the idea that the mass extinctions at the end of the Cretaceous were largely or at least partly due to a massive Earth impact. However, even Walter Alvarez has acknowledged that there were other major changes on Earth even before the impact, such as a drop in [[sea level]] and massive volcanic eruptions that produced the Indian Deccan Traps, and these may have contributed to the extinctions.<ref>{{cite book |last=Alvarez|first= W |title=T. rex and the Crater of Doom |year=1997 |publisher=Princeton University Press |isbn=978-0-691-01630-6 |pages=130–146}}</ref>

===Multiple impact event===
Several other craters also appear to have been formed about the time of the K–Pg boundary. This suggests the possibility of near simultaneous multiple impacts, perhaps from a fragmented asteroidal object, similar to the [[Comet Shoemaker–Levy 9|Shoemaker–Levy 9]] impact with [[Jupiter]]. In addition to the {{convert|180|km|abbr=on|adj=on}} [[Chicxulub Crater]], there is the {{convert|24|km|mi|abbr=on|adj=on}} [[Boltysh crater]] in [[Ukraine]] ({{val|65.17|0.64|u=Ma}}), the {{convert|20|km|mi|abbr=on|adj=on}} [[Silverpit crater]], a suspected impact crater in the [[North Sea]] ({{val|62.5|2.5|u=Ma}}), and the controversial and much larger {{convert|600|km|mi|abbr=on|adj=on}} [[Shiva crater]]. Any other craters that might have formed in the [[Tethys Ocean]] would have been obscured by tectonic events like the relentless northward drift of Africa and India.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Mullen L |date= October 13, 2004 |title= Debating the Dinosaur Extinction| url=http://www.astrobio.net/exclusive/1243/debating-the-dinosaur-extinction|journal=Astrobiology Magazine |accessdate=2012-03-29}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |author=Mullen L| date= October 20, 2004 | title=Multiple impacts |url=http://www.astrobio.net/exclusive/1253/multiple-impacts|journal=Astrobiology Magazine |accessdate=2012-03-29}}</ref><ref name="Mullen Shiva">{{cite journal |author=Mullen L |date=November 3, 2004 |title=Shiva: Another K–T impact? |url=http://www.astrobio.net/exclusive/1281/shiva-another-k-t-impact|journal=Astrobiology Magazine |accessdate=2012-03-29 }}</ref><ref name="chatterjee 1997">{{cite book |last=Chatterjee |first=Sankar |authorlink=Sankar Chatterjee |coauthors= |year=1997 |month=August |chapter=Multiple Impacts at the KT Boundary and the Death of the Dinosaurs |title= 30th International Geological Congress|volume= 26|issue= |pages=31–54 |id= |chapterurl=http://books.google.com/?id=3IORF1Ei3LIC&pg=PA31&dq=Chatterjee+and+Rudra+1996+Shiva|accessdate= 2008-02-22 |quote= |isbn=978-90-6764-254-5 }}</ref>

===Maastrichtian sea-level regression in the north and ingression in the south===
There is clear evidence that sea levels fell in the final stage of the Cretaceous by more than at any other time in the [[Mesozoic]] era. In some [[Maastrichtian]] [[Faunal stage|stage]] rock layers from various parts of the world, the later layers are terrestrial; earlier layers represent shorelines and the earliest layers represent seabeds. These layers do not show the tilting and distortion associated with [[Orogeny|mountain building]], therefore, the likeliest explanation is a "regression", that is, a drop in sea level. There is no direct evidence for the cause of the regression, but the explanation currently accepted as most likely is that the [[plate tectonics|mid-ocean ridges]] became less active and therefore sank under their own weight.<ref name="MacLeod"/><ref>{{cite journal |title=Abrupt deep-sea warming at the end of the Cretaceous |journal=Geology |year=1998 |first1=Liangquan |last1=Li| first2=Gerta|last2=Keller |volume=26 |issue= 11|pages=995–998 |url=http://geology.geoscienceworld.org/cgi/content/abstract/26/11/995 |doi=10.1130/0091-7613(1998)026<0995:ADSWAT>2.3.CO;2|bibcode = 1998Geo....26..995L }}</ref>

A severe regression would have greatly reduced the [[continental shelf]] area, which is the most species-rich part of the sea, and therefore could have been enough to cause a ''marine'' mass extinction. However research concludes that this change would have been insufficient to cause the observed level of ammonite extinction. The regression would also have caused climate changes, partly by disrupting winds and ocean currents and partly by reducing the Earth's [[albedo]] and therefore increasing global temperatures.<ref name="Marshall"/>

Marine regression also resulted in the loss of [[epeiric sea]]s, such as the [[Western Interior Seaway]] of North America. The loss of these seas greatly altered habitats, removing [[coastal plain]]s that ten million years before had been host to diverse communities such as are found in rocks of the [[Dinosaur Park Formation]]. Another consequence was an expansion of [[freshwater]] environments, since continental runoff now had longer distances to travel before reaching oceans. While this change was favorable to [[freshwater]] [[vertebrates]], those that prefer [[ocean|marine]] environments, such as [[shark]]s, suffered.<ref name=AF04/>

An interesting aspect, very poorly studied up to now, is that in coincidence with the regression in the northern hemisphere, southern continents experienced a massive marine ingression, the first related to the Atlantic Ocean, that formed at least three vast epeiric seas in South America. One of them, over the Austral Basin, flooded southernmost Patagonia. Another one flooded Central Patagonia, reaching the Andes foothills, and the northernmost, entering across central Argentina (Buenos Aires Province) flooded the center of the country and reached southern Bolivia in the Potosi Basin.

===Multiple causes===
In a review article, J. David Archibald and David E. Fastovsky discussed a scenario combining three major postulated causes: volcanism, [[marine regression]], and extraterrestrial impact. In this scenario, terrestrial and marine communities were stressed by the changes in and loss of habitats. Dinosaurs, as the largest vertebrates, were the first affected by environmental changes, and their diversity declined. At the same time, [[particulate]] materials from volcanism cooled and dried areas of the globe. Then, an impact event occurred, causing collapses in photosynthesis-based food chains, both in the already-stressed terrestrial food chains and in the marine food chains. The major difference between this hypothesis and the single-cause hypotheses is that its proponents view the suggested single causes as either not sufficient in strength to cause the extinctions or not likely to produce the taxonomic pattern of the extinction.<ref name=AF04/>

==Recovery and radiation==
The K–Pg extinction had a profound effect on the evolution of life on earth. The elimination of dominant Cretaceous groups allowed other organisms to take their place, spurring a remarkable series of [[adaptive radiation]]s in the Paleogene.<ref name="Alroy, J. 1999"/> The most striking example is the replacement of dinosaurs by mammals. After the K–Pg extinction, mammals evolved rapidly to fill the niches left vacant by the dinosaurs. Within mammalian genera, new species were approximately 9.1% larger after the K–Pg boundary.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Alroy J |title=Cope's rule and the dynamics of body mass evolution in North American fossil mammals |journal=Science |volume=280 |issue=5364 |pages=731–4 |year=1998 |month=May |pmid=9563948 |doi= 10.1126/science.280.5364.731|url= |accessdate=|bibcode = 1998Sci...280..731A }}</ref>

Other groups also underwent major radiations. Based on molecular sequencing and fossil dating, Neoaves appeared to radiate after the K–Pg boundary.<ref name="Feduccia, A. 1995"/><ref>{{cite journal |author=Ericson PG, Anderson CL, Britton T, ''et al.'' |title=Diversification of Neoaves: integration of molecular sequence data and fossils |journal=Biol. Lett. |volume=2 |issue=4 |pages=543–7 |year=2006 |month=December |pmid=17148284 |pmc=1834003 |doi=10.1098/rsbl.2006.0523 |url= |accessdate=2013-01-17}}</ref> They even produced giant, flightless forms, such as the herbivorous ''[[Gastornis]]'' and [[Dromornithidae]], and the predatory [[Phorusrhacidae]]. The extinction of Cretaceous lizards and snakes may have led to the radiation of modern groups such as iguanas, monitor lizards, and boas.<ref name="Longrich, N. R. 2012"/> On land, [[Titanoboa|giant boid]] and enormous [[Madtsoiidae|madtsoiid]] snakes appeared, and in the seas, giant [[sea snakes]] radiated. Teleost fish diversified explosively,<ref name="Friedman, M. 2010"/> filling the niches left vacant by the extinction. Groups appearing in the Paleocene and Eocene include billfish, tunas, eels, and flatfish. Major changes are also seen in Paleogene insect communities. Many groups of ants were present in the Cretaceous, but in the Eocene ants became dominant and diverse, with larger colonies. Butterflies diversified as well, perhaps to take the place of leaf-eating insects wiped out by the extinction. The advanced mound-building termites, Termitidae, also rose to prominence.<ref>{{cite book |author=Grimaldi, David A. |title=Evolution of the Insects |publisher=Cambridge Univ Pr (E) |location= |year=2007 |pages= |isbn=0-511-12388-4 |oclc= |doi= |accessdate=}}</ref>

==See also==
*[[Climate across Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary]]
*[[Late Devonian extinction]]
*[[Ordovician–Silurian extinction event]]
*[[Permian–Triassic extinction event]]
*[[Triassic–Jurassic extinction event]]

==References and notes==
{{notes}}
{{clear}}
{{Reflist|colwidth=30em}}

==Further reading==
{{refbegin}}
*{{cite book |last=Fortey|first=R|title=Earth: An Intimate History |year=2005 |publisher=Vintage |isbn=978-0-375-70620-2}}
{{refend}}

==External links==
{{Commons category|K/T Event}}
*{{cite web |url=http://www.geolsoc.org.uk/chicxulub |title=The Great Chicxulub Debate 2004|publisher=Geological Society of London |year=2004 |accessdate=2007-08-02}}
*{{cite web |url=http://geoweb.princeton.edu/people/faculty/keller/chicxulub.html |title=The Chicxulub Debate |publisher=Princeton University |year=2007 |accessdate=2007-08-02}}
*{{cite web |url=http://filebox.vt.edu/artsci/geology/mclean/Dinosaur_Volcano_Extinction/pages/studentv.html |title=The Deccan Traps Volcanism-Greenhouse Dinosaur Extinction Theory |author=McLean D |year=1995 |publisher=University of Vermont |accessdate=2007-08-02}}
*{{cite web |url=http://www.lpl.arizona.edu/SIC/impact_cratering/Chicxulub/Chicx_title.html |title=Chicxulub Impact Event: Understanding the K–T Boundary |author=Kring DA |year=2005 |publisher=NASA Space Imagery Center |accessdate=2007-08-02| archiveurl = http://web.archive.org/web/20070629230804/http://www.lpl.arizona.edu/SIC/impact_cratering/Chicxulub/Chicx_title.html| archivedate = June 29, 2007}}
*{{cite web |url=http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/education/events/cowen1b.html |title=The K–T extinction |author=Cowen R |year=2000 |publisher=University of California Museum of Paleontology |accessdate=2007-08-02}}
*{{cite web |url=http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/diapsids/extinction.html |title=What killed the dinosaurs? |year=1995 |publisher=University of California Museum of Paleontology |accessdate=2007-08-02}}
*{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3520837.stm |title=Dinosaur impact theory challenged |author=Rincon, P|date=2004-03-01 |publisher=BBC News |accessdate=2007-08-02 }}
*{{cite web |url=http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/10/061030-dinosaur-killer.html |title="Dinosaur Killer" Asteroid Only One Part of New Quadruple-Whammy Theory |author=Lovett RA |date=2006-10-30 |publisher=National Geographic News |accessdate=2007-08-02}}
*{{cite news |url=http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/dinosaurs/7368548/Dinosaurs-wiped-out-by-asteroid-impact-that-turned-earth-into-a-hellish-place.html |title=Dinosaurs wiped out by asteroid impact that turned earth into a 'hellish' place|accessdate=2010-03-05 |publisher=The Daily Telegraph | location=London | date=2010-03-04 | first=Richard | last=Alleyne}}

<nowiki>{{KT boundary}}
{{ExtEvent nav}}
{{Extinction}}
{{featured article}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Cretaceous-Tertiary Extinction Event}}
[[Category:Extinction events]]
[[Category:KT boundary|*]]
[[Category:Climate forcing agents]]
[[Category:Cretaceous]]
[[Category:Dinosaurs]]
[[Category:Climate history]]
[[Category:Mammals]]
[[Category:Hypothetical impact events]]
[[Category:Paleogene]]
[[Category:Planetary science]]
[[Category:Volcanoes]]
[[Category:Graphical timelines]]
[[Category:Paleontology]]
[[Category:Evolutionary biology]]


{{Link FA|ar}}
{{Link FA|ar}}
{{Link FA|nl}}
{{Link FA|vi}}
{{Link FA|vi}}
{{link FA|en}}
{{Link FA|zh}}
</nowiki>
{{link FA|nl}}
{{link FA|pt}}
{{link FA|pt}}
{{link FA|zh}}

Wersja z 21:57, 6 paź 2013

Szablon:Pp-move-indef

Artist's rendering of a bolide impact
Badlands near Drumheller, Alberta, where erosion has exposed the K–Pg boundary
A Wyoming (U.S.) rock with an intermediate claystone layer that contains 1000 times more iridium than the upper and lower layers. Picture taken at the San Diego Natural History Museum

The Cretaceous–Paleogene (K–Pg) extinction event,Szablon:Efn formerly known as the Cretaceous–Tertiary (K–T) extinction,Szablon:Efn was a mass extinction of some three-quarters of plant and animal species on Earth—including all non-avian dinosaurs—that occurred over a geologically short period of time 66 million years (Ma) ago.[1][2][3] It marked the end of the Cretaceous period and with it, the entire Mesozoic Era, opening the Cenozoic Era which continues today.

In the geologic record, the K-Pg event is marked by a thin layer of sediment called the K–Pg boundary, which can be found throughout the world in marine and terrestrial rocks. The boundary clay shows high levels of the metal iridium, which is rare in the Earth's crust but abundant in asteroids.

It is generally believed that the K-Pg extinction was triggered by a massive comet/asteroid impact and its catastrophic effects on the global environment, including a lingering impact winter that made it impossible for plants and plankton to carry out photosynthesis.[4] The impact hypothesis was bolstered by the discovery of the 180 kilometrów-wide (112 mi) Chicxulub crater in the Gulf of Mexico in the late 1970s,[5] which provided conclusive evidence that the K–Pg boundary clay represented debris from an asteroid impact.[6] The fact that the extinctions occurred at the same time as the impact provides strong evidence that the K–Pg extinction was caused by the asteroid.[6] However, some scientists maintain the extinction was caused or exacerbated by other factors, such as volcanic eruptions,[7] climate change, and/or sea level change.

A wide range of species perished in the K–Pg extinction. The most well-known victims are the non-avian dinosaurs. However, the extinction also hit other terrestrial organisms, including mammals, pterosaurs, birds,[8] lizards,[9] insects,[10] and plants.[11] In the oceans, the K–Pg extinction devastated the giant marine lizards (Mosasauridae), plesiosaurs, fish,[12] sharks, mollusks (especially ammonites) and many species of plankton. It is estimated that 75% or more of all species on Earth vanished.[13] Yet the devastation caused by the extinction also provided evolutionary opportunities. In the wake of the extinction, many groups underwent remarkable adaptive radiations — a sudden and prolific divergence into new forms and species within the disrupted and emptied ecological niches resulting from the event. Mammals in particular diversified in the Paleogene,[14] producing new forms such as horses, whales, bats, and primates. Birds,[15] fish[16] and perhaps lizards[9] also radiated.

Extinction patterns

Szablon:Annotated image/Extinction The K–Pg extinction event was severe, global, rapid, and selective. In terms of severity, the event eliminated a vast number of species. Based on marine fossils, it is estimated that 75% or more of all species were wiped out by the K–Pg extinction.[17] This is a rough estimate. It is difficult to estimate diversity for modern ecosystems, let alone for fossil ones, and the data are derived primarily from marine invertebrates. Terrestrial organisms, especially insects, represent much of the diversity, but have a poorer record. Despite this, the high levels of extinction seen in terrestrial and marine fossils indicate that the K–Pg extinction is the most severe extinction in the past 250 million years.

The K–Pg extinction was a global event. The event appears to have hit all continents at the same time. Dinosaurs, for example, are known from the Maastrichtian of North America, Europe, Asia, Africa, South America and Antarctica,[18] but are unknown from the Cenozoic anywhere in the world. Similarly, fossil pollen show devastation of the plant communities in areas as far flung as New Mexico, Alaska, China, and New Zealand.[11] The event also affected all seas and oceans. Widespread groups such as mosasaurs and ammonites disappeared around the world. Furthermore, the extinctions occurred at the same time on land and in the sea.

The fossil record shows that the tempo of the K–Pg extinction was extremely rapid, occurring on a scale of thousands of years or less. In some cases, it is possible to study fossils on a very fine scale - centimeter-by-centimeter - through the K–Pg rocks. Examples include marine microfossils, such as calcareous nanoplankton and foraminifera, and terrestrial plant pollen. Here, the fossils show that the ecosystem remained relatively stable up to the K–Pg boundary, at which point many species suddenly vanish. For groups with a poorer fossil record, such as dinosaurs, fossils are unlikely to be preserved just below the K–Pg boundary. For example, only a few dozen Tyrannosaurus skeletons are known, and so the odds of finding one a few centimeters below the boundary are low. This effect, called the Signor-Lipps effect, causes many species appear to vanish before the K–Pg boundary, creating the illusion of gradual extinction. Nevertheless, improved sampling shows that groups once thought to undergo a slow decline, such as dinosaurs, actually disappear suddenly near the K–Pg boundary. Reworking—when fossils are eroded from older rocks and deposited into younger rocks—can also make extinction appear gradual. For example, in the Bug Creek Anthills beds in Montana, dinosaur fossils occur alongside mammals from the earliest Paleocene, which created the illusion that dinosaurs dwindled as mammals radiated. Reworked fossils are recognized because they tend to be rare and are often damaged by the reworking.

The patterns are critical to understanding the cause of the extinctions. The fact that the extinction is severe, global, and rapid suggests that the extinctions result from a severe, global, and rapid environmental disturbance: an environmental catastrophe. In the 1970s and 1980s, this led scientists to seriously consider catastrophic mechanisms such as supernovas, volcanic eruptions, and asteroids, and sparked new interest in catastrophism in geology and paleontology.

The extinction was also highly selective. Some groups were relatively unaffected, others were devastated, and some were eliminated entirely. Many species of alligator, turtle, and salamander survived, for example. Mammals, birds, and lizards suffered high rates of extinction. Non-avian dinosaurs and pterosaurs were wiped out entirely.

Even though the boundary event was severe, there was significant variability in the rate of extinction between and within different clades. Species that depended on photosynthesis declined or became extinct as atmospheric particles blocked sunlight and reduced the solar energy reaching the Earth's surface. This plant extinction caused a major reshuffling of the dominant plant groups.[19] Photosynthesizing organisms, including phytoplankton and land plants, formed the foundation of the food chain in the late Cretaceous as they do today. Evidence suggests that herbivorous animals died out when the plants they depended on for food became scarce. Consequently, top predators such as Tyrannosaurus rex also perished.

Coccolithophorids and molluscs (including ammonites, rudists, freshwater snails and mussels), and those organisms whose food chain included these shell builders, became extinct or suffered heavy losses. For example, it is thought that ammonites were the principal food of mosasaurs, a group of giant marine reptiles that became extinct at the boundary.[20]

Omnivores, insectivores and carrion-eaters survived the extinction event, perhaps because of the increased availability of their food sources. At the end of the Cretaceous there seems to have been no purely herbivorous or carnivorous mammals. Mammals and birds that survived the extinction fed on insects, worms, and snails, which in turn fed on dead plant and animal matter. Scientists hypothesize that these organisms survived the collapse of plant-based food chains because they fed on detritus (non-living organic material).[21][22][23]

In stream communities few animal groups became extinct because stream communities rely less directly on food from living plants and more on detritus that washes in from land, buffering them from extinction.[24] Similar, but more complex patterns have been found in the oceans. Extinction was more severe among animals living in the water column than among animals living on or in the sea floor. Animals in the water column are almost entirely dependent on primary production from living phytoplankton while animals living on or in the ocean floor feed on detritus or can switch to detritus feeding.[21]

The largest air-breathing survivors of the event, crocodyliforms and champsosaurs, were semi-aquatic and had access to detritus. Modern crocodilians can live as scavengers and can survive for months without food, and their young are small, grow slowly, and feed largely on invertebrates and dead organisms or fragments of organisms for their first few years. These characteristics have been linked to crocodilian survival at the end of the Cretaceous.[22]

After the K–Pg extinction event, biodiversity required substantial time to recover, despite the existence of abundant vacant ecological niches.[21]

Microbiota

The K–Pg boundary represents one of the most dramatic turnovers in the fossil record for various calcareous nanoplankton that formed the calcium deposits that gave the Cretaceous its name. The turnover in this group is clearly marked at the species level.[25][26] Statistical analysis of marine losses at this time suggests that the decrease in diversity was caused more by a sharp increase in extinctions than by a decrease in speciation.[27] The K–Pg boundary record of dinoflagellates is not as well-understood, mainly because only microbial cysts provide a fossil record, and not all dinoflagellate species have cyst-forming stages, thereby likely causing diversity to be underestimated.[21] Recent studies indicate that there were no major shifts in dinoflagellates through the boundary layer.[28]

Radiolaria have left a geological record since at least the Ordovician times, and their mineral fossil skeletons can be tracked across the K–Pg boundary. There is no evidence of mass extinction of these organisms, and there is support for high productivity of these species in southern high latitudes as a result of cooling temperatures in the early Paleocene.[21] Approximately 46% of diatom species survived the transition from the Cretaceous to the Upper Paleocene. This suggests a significant turnover in species, but not a catastrophic extinction of diatoms, across the K–Pg boundary.[21][29]

The occurrence of planktonic foraminifera across the K–Pg boundary has been studied since the 1930s.[30][31] Research spurred by the possibility of an impact event at the K–Pg boundary resulted in numerous publications detailing planktonic foraminiferal extinction at the boundary.[21] However, there is debate ongoing between groups that believe the evidence indicates substantial extinction of these species at the K–Pg boundary,[32] and those who believe the evidence supports multiple extinctions and expansions through the boundary.[33][34]

Numerous species of benthic foraminifera became extinct during the K–Pg extinction event, presumably because they depend on organic debris for nutrients, since the biomass in the ocean is thought to have decreased. However, as the marine microbiota recovered, it is thought that increased speciation of benthic foraminifera resulted from the increase in food sources.[21] Phytoplankton recovery in the early Paleocene provided the food source to support large benthic foraminiferal assemblages, which are mainly detritus-feeding. Ultimate recovery of the benthic populations occurred over several stages lasting several hundred thousand years into the early Paleocene.[35][36]

Marine invertebrates

An ammonite fossil

There is variability in the fossil record as to the extinction rate of marine invertebrates across the K–Pg boundary. The apparent rate is influenced by the lack of fossil records rather than actual extinction.[21]

Ostracods, a class of small crustaceans that were prevalent in the upper Maastrichtian, left fossil deposits in a variety of locations. A review of these fossils shows that ostracode diversity was lower in the Paleocene than any other time in the Tertiary. However, current research cannot ascertain whether the extinctions occurred prior to or during the boundary interval itself.[37][38]

Approximately 60% of late-Cretaceous Scleractinia coral genera failed to cross the K–Pg boundary into the Paleocene. Further analysis of the coral extinctions shows that approximately 98% of colonial species, ones that inhabit warm, shallow tropical waters, became extinct. The solitary corals, which generally do not form reefs and inhabit colder and deeper (below the photic zone) areas of the ocean were less impacted by the K–Pg boundary. Colonial coral species rely upon symbiosis with photosynthetic algae, which collapsed due to the events surrounding the K–Pg boundary.[39][40] However, the use of data from coral fossils to support K–Pg extinction and subsequent Paleocene recovery must be weighed against the changes that occurred in coral ecosystems through the K–Pg boundary.[21]

The numbers of cephalopod, echinoderm, and bivalve genera exhibited significant diminution after the K–Pg boundary.[21] Most species of brachiopods, a small phylum of marine invertebrates, survived the K–Pg extinction event and diversified during the early Paleocene.

Rudist bivalves from the Late Cretaceous of the Omani Mountains, United Arab Emirates. Scale bar is 10 mm

Except for nautiloids (represented by the modern order Nautilida) and coleoids (which had already diverged into modern octopodes, squids, and cuttlefish) all other species of the molluscan class Cephalopoda became extinct at the K–Pg boundary. These included the ecologically significant belemnoids, as well as the ammonoids, a group of highly diverse, numerous, and widely distributed shelled cephalopods. Researchers have pointed out that the reproductive strategy of the surviving nautiloids, which rely upon few and larger eggs, played a role in outsurviving their ammonoid counterparts through the extinction event. The ammonoids utilized a planktonic strategy of reproduction (numerous eggs and planktonic larvae), which would have been devastated by the K–Pg extinction event. Additional research has shown that subsequent to this elimination of ammonoids from the global biota, nautiloids began an evolutionary radiation into shell shapes and complexities theretofore known only from ammonoids.[41][42]

Approximately 35% of echinoderm genera became extinct at the K–Pg boundary, although taxa that thrived in low-latitude, shallow-water environments during late Cretaceous had the highest extinction rate. Mid-latitude, deep-water echinoderms were much less affected at the K–Pg boundary. The pattern of extinction points to habitat loss, specifically the drowning of carbonate platforms, the shallow-water reefs in existence at that time, by the extinction event.[43]

Other invertebrate groups, including rudists (reef-building clams) and inoceramids (giant relatives of modern scallops), also became extinct at the K–Pg boundary.[44][45]

Fish

There are substantial fossil records of jawed fishes across the K–Pg boundary, which provides good evidence of extinction patterns of these classes of marine vertebrates. Within cartilaginous fish, approximately 80% of the sharks, rays, and skates families survived the extinction event,[21] and more than 90% of teleost fish (bony fish) families survived.[46] There is evidence of a mass kill of bony fishes at a fossil site immediately above the K–Pg boundary layer on Seymour Island near Antarctica, apparently precipitated by the K–Pg extinction event.[47] However, the marine and freshwater environments of fishes mitigated environmental effects of the extinction event.[48]

Terrestrial invertebrates

Insect damage to the fossilized leaves of flowering plants from fourteen sites in North America were used as a proxy for insect diversity across the K–Pg boundary and analyzed to determine the rate of extinction. Researchers found that Cretaceous sites, prior to the extinction event, had rich plant and insect-feeding diversity. However, during the early Paleocene, flora were relatively diverse with little predation from insects, even 1.7 million years after the extinction event.[49][50]

Terrestrial plants

There is overwhelming evidence of global disruption of plant communities at the K–Pg boundary.[11][11][51][52] Extinctions are seen both in studies of fossil pollen, and fossil leaves.[11] In North America, the data suggest massive devastation and mass extinction of plants at the K–Pg boundary sections, although there were substantial megafloral changes before the boundary.[11][53] In North America, approximately 57% of plant species became extinct. In high southern hemisphere latitudes, such as New Zealand and Antarctica the mass die-off of flora caused no significant turnover in species, but dramatic and short-term changes in the relative abundance of plant groups.[49][54] In some regions, Paleocene recovery of plants began with recolonizations by fern species, represented as a fern spike in the geologic record; this same pattern of fern recolonization was observed after the 1980 Mount St. Helens eruption.[55] However the patterns of recovery were quite variable. Different fern species were responsible for the fern spike in different areas, and in some regions, no fern spike is evident.

Due to the wholesale destruction of plants at the K–Pg boundary there was a proliferation of saprotrophic organisms such as fungi that do not require photosynthesis and use nutrients from decaying vegetation. The dominance of fungal species lasted only a few years while the atmosphere cleared and there was plenty of organic matter to feed on. Once the atmosphere cleared, photosynthetic organisms like ferns and other plants returned.[56] Polyploidy appears to have enhanced the ability of flowering plants to survive the extinction, probably because the additional copies of the genome such plants possessed allowed them to more readily adapt to the rapidly changing environmental conditions that followed the impact.[57]

Amphibians

There is limited evidence for extinction of amphibians at the K–Pg boundary. A study of fossil vertebrates across the K–Pg boundary in Montana concluded that no species of amphibian became extinct.[58] Yet there are several species of Maastrichtian amphibian, not included as part of this study, which are unknown from the Paleocene. These include the frog Theatonius lancensis [59] and the albanerpetontid Albanerpeton galaktion;[60] therefore some amphibians do seem to have become extinct at the boundary. The relatively low levels of extinction seen among amphibians probably reflect the low extinction rates seen in freshwater animals.[61]

Non-archosaur reptiles

Large marine reptiles such as mosasaurs and plesiosaurs died out by the end of the Cretaceous.

The two living non-archosaurian reptile taxa, testudines (turtles) and lepidosaurs (snakes, lizards, and amphisbaenians (worm lizards)), along with choristoderes (semi-aquatic archosauromorphs that died out in the early Miocene), survived through the K–Pg boundary.[21] Over 80% of Cretaceous turtle species passed through the K–Pg boundary. Additionally, all six turtle families in existence at the end of the Cretaceous survived into the Paleogene and are represented by current species.[62] Living lepidosaurs include Rhynchocephalia (tuataras) and Squamata. The Rhynchocephalia were a widespread and relatively successful group of lepidosaurs in the early Mesozoic, but began to decline by the mid-Cretaceous. They are represented today by a single genus located exclusively in New Zealand.[63]

The order Squamata, which is represented today by lizards, snakes, and amphisbaenians, radiated into various ecological niches during the Jurassic and were successful throughout the Cretaceous. They survived through the K–Pg boundary and are currently the most successful and diverse group of living reptiles with more than 6,000 extant species. No known family of terrestrial squamates became extinct at the boundary, and fossil evidence indicates they did not suffer any significant decline in numbers. Their small size, adaptable metabolism, and ability to move to more favorable habitats were key factors in their survivability during the late Cretaceous and early Paleocene.[21][62] Giant non-archosaurian aquatic reptiles such as mosasaurs and plesiosaurs, which were the top marine predators of their time, became extinct by the end of the Cretaceous.[64][65] This is most likely due to their size, which meant they were less able to adapt during the aftermath of the extinction event.

Archosaurs

The archosaur clade includes two living orders, crocodilians (of which Alligatoridae, Crocodylidae and Gavialidae are the only surviving families) and dinosaurs (of which birds are the sole surviving members), along with the extinct non-avian dinosaurs and pterosaurs.

Crocodyliforms

Ten families of crocodilians or their close relatives are represented in the Maastrichtian fossil records, of which five died out prior to the K–Pg boundary.[66] Five families have both Maastrichtian and Paleocene fossil representatives. All of the surviving families of crocodyliforms inhabited freshwater and terrestrial environments—except for the Dyrosauridae, which lived in freshwater and marine locations. Approximately 50% of crocodyliform representatives survived across the K–Pg boundary, the only apparent trend being that no large crocodiles survived.[21] Crocodyliform survivability across the boundary may have resulted from their aquatic niche and ability to burrow, which reduced susceptibility to negative environmental effects at the boundary.[48] Jouve and colleagues suggested in 2008 that juvenile marine crocodyliforms lived in freshwater environments like modern marine crocodile juveniles, which would have helped them survive where other marine reptiles became extinct; freshwater environments were not as strongly affected by the K–Pg extinction event as marine environments.[67]

The Choristodera, a generally crocodile-like group of uncertain phylogeny (possibly archosaurian) also survived the event, only to go extinct in the Miocene.[68]

Pterosaurs

One family of pterosaurs, Azhdarchidae, was definitely present in the Maastrichtian, and it became extinct at the K–Pg boundary. These large pterosaurs were the last representatives of a declining group that contained 10 families during the mid-Cretaceous. Smaller pterosaurs became extinct prior to the Maastrichtian during a period that saw a decline in smaller animal species while larger species became more prevalent. Recently, several pterosaur taxa have been discovered dating to the Campanian/Maastrichtian, such as the ornithocheirids Piksi and "Ornithocheirus", possible pteranodontids and nyctosaurids, and a tapejarid.[69] While this was occurring, modern birds were undergoing diversification and replacing archaic birds and pterosaur groups, possibly due to direct competition, or they simply filled empty niches.[48][70][71] However, ecological overlap between birds and pterosaurs seems to have been minimal,[72][73][74] and it appears that pterosaur extinction seems to coincide with a bizarre "diversity freeze", with the sudden radiation of species in the Lower Cretaceous apparently simply ceasing to diversify, leaving them vulnerable to minor extinction events like the Cretaceous Thermal Maximum[75]

Birds

Most paleontologists regard birds as the only surviving dinosaurs (see Origin of birds). However, all non-neornithean birds became extinct, including flourishing groups like enantiornithines and hesperornithiforms.[76] Several analyses of bird fossils show divergence of species prior to the K–Pg boundary, and that duck, chicken and ratite bird relatives coexisted with non-avian dinosaurs.[77] Large collections of bird fossils representing a range of different species provides definitive evidence for the persistence of archaic birds to within 300,000 years of the K–Pg boundary. None of them are known to survive into the Paleogene, and their persistence into the latest Maastrichtian therefore provides strong evidence for a mass extinction of archaic birds coinciding with the Chicxulub asteroid impact. A small fraction of the Cretaceous bird species survived the impact, giving rise to today's birds.[78][79] So far, only a single bird species, which has not been named, has been confidently identified from both above and below the K–Pg boundary (it is present in the Maastrichtian Hell Creek Formation and Danian Fort Union Formation).[78] The only bird group known for certain to have survived the K–Pg boundary is the Neornithines (though one Paleogene species, Qinornis paleocenica, may represent a surviving non-neornithine bird).[78] Neornithines may have been able to survive the extinction as a result of their abilities to dive, swim, or seek shelter in water and marshlands. Many species of neornithines can build burrows, or nest in tree holes or termite nests, all of which provided shelter from the environmental effects at the K–Pg boundary. Long-term survival past the boundary was assured as a result of filling ecological niches left empty by extinction of non-avian dinosaurs.[48]

Non-avian dinosaurs

Tyrannosaurus was one of the last dinosaurs to live on Earth before the extinction.

Excluding a few controversial claims, scientists agree that all non-avian dinosaurs became extinct at the K–Pg boundary. The dinosaur fossil record has been interpreted to show both a decline in diversity and no decline in diversity during the last few million years of the Cretaceous, and it may be that the quality of the dinosaur fossil record is simply not good enough to permit researchers to distinguish between the options.[80] Since there is no evidence that late Maastrichtian nonavian dinosaurs could burrow, swim or dive, they were unable to shelter themselves from the worst parts of any environmental stress that occurred at the K–Pg boundary. It is possible that small dinosaurs (other than birds) did survive, but they would have been deprived of food as both herbivorous dinosaurs would have found plant material scarce, and carnivores would have quickly found prey in short supply.[48]

The growing consensus about the endothermy of dinosaurs (see dinosaur physiology) helps to understand their full extinction in contrast with their close relatives, the crocodilians. Ectothermic ("cold-blooded") crocodiles have very limited needs for food (they can survive several months without eating) while endothermic ("warm-blooded") animals of similar size need much more food to sustain their faster metabolism. Thus, under the circumstances of food chain disruption previously mentioned, non-avian dinosaurs died,[19] while some crocodiles survived. In this context, the survival of other endothermic animals, such as some birds and mammals, could be due, among other reasons, to their smaller needs for food, related to their small size at the extinction epoch.[81]

Whether the extinction occurred gradually or very suddenly has been debated, as both views have support in the fossil record. A study of 29 fossil sites in Catalan Pyrenees of Europe in 2010 supports that dinosaurs there had great diversity until the asteroid impact, with over 100 living species.[82] However, more recent research indicates that this figure is obscured by taphonomical biases and the scarcity of the continental fossil record. The results of this study, which were based on estimated real global biodiversity, showed that between 628 and 1078 non-avian dinosaur species were alive at the end of the Cretaceous and underwent sudden extinction after the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event.[83] Alternatively, interpretation based on the fossil bearing rocks along the Red Deer River in Alberta, Canada, supports the gradual extinction of non-avian dinosaurs; during the last 10 million years of the Cretaceous layers there, the number of dinosaur species seems to have decreased from about 45 to about 12. Other scientists have pointed out the same.[84]

Several researchers support the existence of Paleocene dinosaurs. Evidence of this existence is based on the discovery of dinosaur remains in the Hell Creek Formation up to 1,3 m (4,3 ft) above and Szablon:Val later than the K–Pg boundary.[85] Pollen samples recovered near a fossilized hadrosaur femur recovered in the Ojo Alamo Sandstone at the San Juan River indicate that the animal lived during the Tertiary, approximately Szablon:Val (about 1 million years after the K–Pg extinction event). If their existence past the K–Pg boundary can be confirmed, these hadrosaurids would be considered a Dead Clade Walking.[86] Scientific consensus is that these fossils were eroded from their original locations and then re-buried in much later sediments (also known as reworked fossils).[87]

Hell Creek formation

Mammals

All major Cretaceous mammalian lineages, including monotremes (egg-laying mammals), multituberculates, marsupials and placentals, dryolestoideans,[88] and gondwanatheres[89] survived the K–Pg extinction event, although they suffered losses. In particular, marsupials largely disappeared from North America, and the Asian deltatheroidans, primitive relatives of extant marsupials, became extinct.[90] In the Hell Creek beds of North America, at least half of the ten known multituberculate species and all eleven marsupial species are not found above the boundary.[80]

Mammalian species began diversifying approximately 30 million years prior to the K–Pg boundary. Diversification of mammals stalled across the boundary.[91] Current research indicates that mammals did not explosively diversify across the K–Pg boundary, despite the environment niches made available by the extinction of dinosaurs.[92] Several mammalian orders have been interpreted as diversifying immediately after the K–Pg boundary, including Chiroptera (bats) and Cetartiodactyla (a diverse group that today includes whales and dolphins and even-toed ungulates),[92] although recent research concludes that only marsupial orders diversified after the K–Pg boundary.[91]

K–Pg boundary mammalian species were generally small, comparable in size to rats; this small size would have helped them to find shelter in protected environments. In addition, it is postulated that some early monotremes, marsupials, and placentals were semiaquatic or burrowing, as there are multiple mammalian lineages with such habits today. Any burrowing or semiaquatic mammal would have had additional protection from K–Pg boundary environmental stresses.[48]

Evidence

North American fossils

In North American terrestrial sequences, the extinction event is best represented by the marked discrepancy between the rich and relatively abundant late-Maastrichtian palynomorph record and the post-boundary fern spike.[51]

At present the most informative sequence of dinosaur-bearing rocks in the world from the K–Pg boundary is found in western North America, particularly the late Maastrichtian-age Hell Creek Formation of Montana, US. This formation, when compared with the older (approximately 75 Ma) Judith River/Dinosaur Park Formations (from Montana, USA, and Alberta, Canada, respectively) provides information on the changes in dinosaur populations over the last 10 million years of the Cretaceous. These fossil beds are geographically limited, covering only part of one continent.[80]

The middle–late Campanian formations show a greater diversity of dinosaurs than any other single group of rocks. The late Maastrichtian rocks contain the largest members of several major clades: Tyrannosaurus, Ankylosaurus, Pachycephalosaurus, Triceratops and Torosaurus,[93] which suggests food was plentiful immediately prior to the extinction.

In addition to rich dinosaur fossils, there are also plant fossils that illustrate the reduction in plant species across the K–Pg boundary. In the sediments below the K–Pg boundary the dominant plant remains are angiosperm pollen grains, but the actual boundary layer contains little pollen and is dominated by fern spores.[94] Normal pollen levels gradually resume above the boundary layer. This is reminiscent of areas blighted by modern volcanic eruptions, where the recovery is led by ferns, which are later replaced by larger angiosperm plants.[95]

Marine fossils

The mass extinction of marine plankton appears to have been abrupt and right at the K–Pg boundary.[96] Ammonite genera became extinct at or near the K–Pg boundary; however, there was a smaller and slower extinction of ammonite genera prior to the boundary that was associated with a late Cretaceous marine regression. The gradual extinction of most inoceramid bivalves began well before the K–Pg boundary, and a small, gradual reduction in ammonite diversity occurred throughout the very late Cretaceous.[97] Further analysis shows that several processes were in progress in the late Cretaceous seas and partially overlapped in time, then ended with the abrupt mass extinction.[97]

Megatsunamis

The scientific consensus is that bolide impact at the K–Pg boundary left tsunami deposits and sediments around the area of the Caribbean Sea and Gulf of Mexico.[98] These deposits have been identified in the La Popa basin in northeastern Mexico,[99] platform carbonates in northeastern Brazil,[100] and Atlantic deep-sea sediments.[101]

Duration

The length of time taken for the extinction to occur is a controversial issue, because some theories about the extinction's causes require a rapid extinction over a relatively short period (from a few years to a few thousand years) while others require longer periods. The issue is difficult to resolve because of the Signor–Lipps effect; that is, the fossil record is so incomplete that most extinct species probably died out long after the most recent fossil that has been found.[102] Scientists have also found very few continuous beds of fossil-bearing rock which cover a time range from several million years before the K–Pg extinction to a few million years after it.[21]

Chicxulub asteroid impact

 Osobne artykuły: Cretaceous–Paleogene boundary
UWAGA: sugestia rozszerzonej treści w nieistniejącym artykule - trzeba poprawić link, Alvarez hypothesisChicxulub crater.
Artist's impression of an asteroid striking Earth at the end of the Cretaceous

Evidence for impact

In 1980, a team of researchers consisting of Nobel prize-winning physicist Luis Alvarez, his son geologist Walter Alvarez, and chemists Frank Asaro and Helen Michel discovered that sedimentary layers found all over the world at the Cretaceous–Paleogene boundary contain a concentration of iridium many times greater than normal (30, 160 and 20 times in three sections originally studied). Iridium is extremely rare in Earth's crust because it is a siderophile element, and therefore most of it travelled with the iron as it sank into Earth's core during planetary differentiation. As iridium remains abundant in most asteroids and comets, the Alvarez team suggested that an asteroid struck the Earth at the time of the K–Pg boundary.[4] There were earlier speculations on the possibility of an impact event, but this was the first hard evidence of an impact.[103]

The K–Pg boundary exposure in Trinidad Lake State Park, in the Raton Basin of Colorado, shows an abrupt change from dark- to light-colored rock. White line added to mark the transition.

This hypothesis was viewed as radical when first proposed, but additional evidence soon emerged. The boundary clay was found to be full of minute spherules of rock, crystallized from droplets of molten rock formed during by the impact.[104] Shocked quartz and other minerals were also identified in the K–Pg boundary.[105][106] Shocked minerals have their internal structure deformed, and are created by intense pressures such as those associated with nuclear blasts or meteorite impacts. The identification of giant tsunami beds along the Gulf Coast and the Caribbean also provided evidence for impact,[107] and suggested that the impact may have occurred nearby- as did the fact that the K–Pg boundary became thicker in the southern United States, with meter-thick beds of debris occurring in northern New Mexico.[11]

Szablon:Blakey 65moll.jpg K/T impact site

Radar topography reveals the 180 km-wide (112 mi) ring of the Chicxulub Crater.

Further research identified the giant Chicxulub crater, buried under Chicxulub on the coast of Yucatán, Mexico as the source of the K–Pg boundary clay. Identified in 1990[5] based on work by Glen Penfield 1978, the crater is oval, with an average diameter of roughly 180 kilometrów (110 mi), about the size calculated by the Alvarez team.[108] The discovery of the crater – a necessary prediction of the impact hypothesis – provided conclusive evidence for a K–Pg impact, and strengthened the hypothesis that the extinction was caused by an impact.

In 2007, a hypothesis was put forth that argued the impactor that killed the dinosaurs belonged to the Baptistina family of asteroids.[109] Concerns have been raised regarding the reputed link, in part because very few solid observational constraints exist of the asteroid or family.[110] Indeed, it was recently discovered that 298 Baptistina does not share the same chemical signature as the source of the K–Pg impact.[111] Although this finding may make the link between the Baptistina family and K–Pg impactor more difficult to substantiate, it does not preclude the possibility.[111] A 2011 WISE study of reflected light from the asteroids of the family estimated the break-up at 80 Ma, giving it insufficient time to shift orbits and impact the Earth by 66 Ma.[112]

Paul Renne of the Berkeley Geochronology Center has reported that the date of the asteroid event is Szablon:Val million years ago, based on argon–argon dating. He further posits that the mass extinction occurred within 33,000 years of this date.[2][113]

Effects of impact

Such an impact would have inhibited photosynthesis by generating a dust cloud that blocked sunlight for a year or less, and by injecting sulfuric acid aerosols into the stratosphere, which would have reduced sunlight reaching the Earth's surface by 10–20%. It would take at least ten years for those aerosols to dissipate, which would account for the extinction of plants and phytoplankton, and of organisms dependent on them (including predatory animals as well as herbivores). Small creatures whose food chains were based on detritus would have a reasonable chance of survival.[81][96] The consequences of reentry of ejecta into Earth's atmosphere would include a brief (hours long) but intense pulse of infrared radiation, killing exposed organisms.[48] Global firestorms likely resulted from the heat pulse and the fall back to Earth of incendiary fragments from the blast. Recent research indicates that the global debris layer deposited by the impact contained enough soot to suggest that the entire terrestrial biosphere had burned.[114] The high O2 levels during the late Cretaceous would have supported intense combustion. The level of atmospheric O2 plummeted in the early Tertiary Period. If widespread fires occurred, they would have increased the CO2 content of the atmosphere and caused a temporary greenhouse effect once the dust cloud settled, and this would have exterminated the most vulnerable organisms that survived the period immediately after the impact.[115]

The impact may also have produced acid rain, depending on what type of rock the asteroid struck. However, recent research suggests this effect was relatively minor, lasting for approximately Szablon:Val.[96] The acidity was neutralized by the environment, and the survival of animals vulnerable to acid rain effects (such as frogs) indicate this was not a major contributor to extinction. Impact theories can only explain very rapid extinctions, since the dust clouds and possible sulfuric aerosols would wash out of the atmosphere in a fairly short time—possibly within Szablon:Val.[116]

The shape and location of the crater indicate further causes of devastation in addition to the dust cloud. The asteroid landed in the ocean and would have caused megatsunamis, for which evidence has been found in several locations in the Caribbean and eastern United States—marine sand in locations that were then inland, and vegetation debris and terrestrial rocks in marine sediments dated to the time of the impact. The asteroid landed in a bed of gypsum (calcium sulfate), which would have produced a vast sulfur dioxide aerosol. This would have further reduced the sunlight reaching the Earth's surface and then precipitated as acid rain, killing vegetation, plankton, and organisms that build shells from calcium carbonate (coccolithophores and molluscs). In February 2008, a team of researchers used seismic images of the crater to determine that the impactor landed in deeper water than was previously assumed. They argued that this would have resulted in increased sulfate aerosols in the atmosphere, which could have made the impact deadlier by altering climate and by generating acid rain.[117]

Most paleontologists now agree that an asteroid did hit the Earth at approximately the end of the Cretaceous, but there is an ongoing dispute whether the impact was the sole cause of the extinctions.[34][118] There is evidence that there was an interval of about Szablon:Val from the impact to the mass extinction.[119] In 1997, paleontologist Sankar Chatterjee drew attention to the proposed and much larger 600 km (370 mi) Shiva crater and the possibility of a multiple-impact scenario.

In Szablon:Date an international panel of scientists endorsed the asteroid hypothesis, specifically the Chicxulub impact, as being the cause of the extinction. A team of 41 scientists reviewed Szablon:Val of scientific literature and in so doing also ruled out other theories such as massive volcanism. They had determined that a 10 do 15 kilometrów (6,2 do 9,3 mi) space rock hurtled into Earth at Chicxulub on Mexico's Yucatan Peninsula. The collision would have released the same energy as 100 teratonnes of TNT (420 ZJ), over a billion times the energy of the bombs dropped on Nagasaki and Hiroshima.[6]

Alternative hypotheses

The fact that the extinctions occur at the same time as the Chicxulub asteroid impact strongly supports the impact hypothesis of extinction. However, some scientists continue to dispute the role of the Chicxulub impact in driving the extinction, and to suggest that other events may have contributed to the end-Cretaceous mass extinction. In particular, volcanic eruptions, climate change, sea level change, and other impact events have been suggested to play a role in driving the K–Pg extinction.

Deccan Traps

 Osobny artykuł: Deccan Traps
UWAGA: sugestia rozszerzonej treści w nieistniejącym artykule - trzeba poprawić link.

Before 2000, arguments that the Deccan Traps flood basalts caused the extinction were usually linked to the view that the extinction was gradual, as the flood basalt events were thought to have started around Szablon:Val and lasted more than Szablon:Val. The most recent evidence shows that the traps erupted over a period of Szablon:Val spanning the K–Pg boundary, and therefore may be responsible for the extinction and the delayed biotic recovery thereafter.[120]

The Deccan Traps could have caused extinction through several mechanisms, including the release of dust and sulfuric aerosols into the air, which might have blocked sunlight and thereby reduced photosynthesis in plants. In addition, Deccan Trap volcanism might have resulted in carbon dioxide emissions that increased the greenhouse effect when the dust and aerosols cleared from the atmosphere.[121]

In the years when the Deccan Traps hypothesis was linked to a slower extinction, Luis Alvarez (who died in 1988) replied that paleontologists were being misled by sparse data. While his assertion was not initially well-received, later intensive field studies of fossil beds lent weight to his claim. Eventually, most paleontologists began to accept the idea that the mass extinctions at the end of the Cretaceous were largely or at least partly due to a massive Earth impact. However, even Walter Alvarez has acknowledged that there were other major changes on Earth even before the impact, such as a drop in sea level and massive volcanic eruptions that produced the Indian Deccan Traps, and these may have contributed to the extinctions.[122]

Multiple impact event

Several other craters also appear to have been formed about the time of the K–Pg boundary. This suggests the possibility of near simultaneous multiple impacts, perhaps from a fragmented asteroidal object, similar to the Shoemaker–Levy 9 impact with Jupiter. In addition to the 180 km (110 mi) Chicxulub Crater, there is the 24 km (15 mi) Boltysh crater in Ukraine (Szablon:Val), the 20 km (12 mi) Silverpit crater, a suspected impact crater in the North Sea (Szablon:Val), and the controversial and much larger 600 km (370 mi) Shiva crater. Any other craters that might have formed in the Tethys Ocean would have been obscured by tectonic events like the relentless northward drift of Africa and India.[123][124][125][126]

Maastrichtian sea-level regression in the north and ingression in the south

There is clear evidence that sea levels fell in the final stage of the Cretaceous by more than at any other time in the Mesozoic era. In some Maastrichtian stage rock layers from various parts of the world, the later layers are terrestrial; earlier layers represent shorelines and the earliest layers represent seabeds. These layers do not show the tilting and distortion associated with mountain building, therefore, the likeliest explanation is a "regression", that is, a drop in sea level. There is no direct evidence for the cause of the regression, but the explanation currently accepted as most likely is that the mid-ocean ridges became less active and therefore sank under their own weight.[21][127]

A severe regression would have greatly reduced the continental shelf area, which is the most species-rich part of the sea, and therefore could have been enough to cause a marine mass extinction. However research concludes that this change would have been insufficient to cause the observed level of ammonite extinction. The regression would also have caused climate changes, partly by disrupting winds and ocean currents and partly by reducing the Earth's albedo and therefore increasing global temperatures.[97]

Marine regression also resulted in the loss of epeiric seas, such as the Western Interior Seaway of North America. The loss of these seas greatly altered habitats, removing coastal plains that ten million years before had been host to diverse communities such as are found in rocks of the Dinosaur Park Formation. Another consequence was an expansion of freshwater environments, since continental runoff now had longer distances to travel before reaching oceans. While this change was favorable to freshwater vertebrates, those that prefer marine environments, such as sharks, suffered.[80]

An interesting aspect, very poorly studied up to now, is that in coincidence with the regression in the northern hemisphere, southern continents experienced a massive marine ingression, the first related to the Atlantic Ocean, that formed at least three vast epeiric seas in South America. One of them, over the Austral Basin, flooded southernmost Patagonia. Another one flooded Central Patagonia, reaching the Andes foothills, and the northernmost, entering across central Argentina (Buenos Aires Province) flooded the center of the country and reached southern Bolivia in the Potosi Basin.

Multiple causes

In a review article, J. David Archibald and David E. Fastovsky discussed a scenario combining three major postulated causes: volcanism, marine regression, and extraterrestrial impact. In this scenario, terrestrial and marine communities were stressed by the changes in and loss of habitats. Dinosaurs, as the largest vertebrates, were the first affected by environmental changes, and their diversity declined. At the same time, particulate materials from volcanism cooled and dried areas of the globe. Then, an impact event occurred, causing collapses in photosynthesis-based food chains, both in the already-stressed terrestrial food chains and in the marine food chains. The major difference between this hypothesis and the single-cause hypotheses is that its proponents view the suggested single causes as either not sufficient in strength to cause the extinctions or not likely to produce the taxonomic pattern of the extinction.[80]

Recovery and radiation

The K–Pg extinction had a profound effect on the evolution of life on earth. The elimination of dominant Cretaceous groups allowed other organisms to take their place, spurring a remarkable series of adaptive radiations in the Paleogene.[14] The most striking example is the replacement of dinosaurs by mammals. After the K–Pg extinction, mammals evolved rapidly to fill the niches left vacant by the dinosaurs. Within mammalian genera, new species were approximately 9.1% larger after the K–Pg boundary.[128]

Other groups also underwent major radiations. Based on molecular sequencing and fossil dating, Neoaves appeared to radiate after the K–Pg boundary.[15][129] They even produced giant, flightless forms, such as the herbivorous Gastornis and Dromornithidae, and the predatory Phorusrhacidae. The extinction of Cretaceous lizards and snakes may have led to the radiation of modern groups such as iguanas, monitor lizards, and boas.[9] On land, giant boid and enormous madtsoiid snakes appeared, and in the seas, giant sea snakes radiated. Teleost fish diversified explosively,[16] filling the niches left vacant by the extinction. Groups appearing in the Paleocene and Eocene include billfish, tunas, eels, and flatfish. Major changes are also seen in Paleogene insect communities. Many groups of ants were present in the Cretaceous, but in the Eocene ants became dominant and diverse, with larger colonies. Butterflies diversified as well, perhaps to take the place of leaf-eating insects wiped out by the extinction. The advanced mound-building termites, Termitidae, also rose to prominence.[130]

See also

References and notes

Szablon:Notes
Szablon:Reflist

Further reading

Szablon:Refbegin

Szablon:Refend

External links

Szablon:Commons category

{{KT boundary}} {{ExtEvent nav}} {{Extinction}} {{featured article}} {{DEFAULTSORT:Cretaceous-Tertiary Extinction Event}} [[Category:Extinction events]] [[Category:KT boundary|*]] [[Category:Climate forcing agents]] [[Category:Cretaceous]] [[Category:Dinosaurs]] [[Category:Climate history]] [[Category:Mammals]] [[Category:Hypothetical impact events]] [[Category:Paleogene]] [[Category:Planetary science]] [[Category:Volcanoes]] [[Category:Graphical timelines]] [[Category:Paleontology]] [[Category:Evolutionary biology]] {{Link FA|ar}} {{Link FA|nl}} {{Link FA|vi}} {{Link FA|zh}}

  1. Szablon:Cite web
  2. a b Szablon:Cite journal
  3. Szablon:Cite book
  4. a b Szablon:Cite journal
  5. a b Hildebrand, A. R., G. T. Penfield, et al. (1991). "Chicxulub crater: a possible Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary impact crater on the Yucatan peninsula, Mexico." Geology 19: 867-871.
  6. a b c Szablon:Cite doi
  7. Keller, G. (2012). The Cretaceous--Tertiary Mass Extinction, Chicxulub Impact, and Deccan Volcanism. Earth and Life, Springer: 759--793.
  8. Longrich, N. R., T. T. Tokaryk, et al. (2011). "Mass extinction of birds at the Cretaceous-Paleogene (K–Pg) boundary." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108(37): 15253-15257.
  9. a b c Longrich, N. R., A.-B. S. Bhullar, et al. (2012). "Mass extinction of lizards and snakes at the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences doi: 10.1073/pnas.1211526110
  10. Labandeira, C. C., K. R. Johnson, et al. (2002). "Preliminary assessment of insect herbivory across the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary: major extinction and minimum rebound." Geological Society of America Special Paper 361: 297-327.
  11. a b c d e f g Nichols, D. J. and K. R. Johnson (2008). Plants and the K–T Boundary. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  12. Friedman, M. (2009). "Ecomorphological selectivity among marine teleost fishes during the end-Cretaceous extinction." PNAS 106: 5218-5223.
  13. Jablonski, D., 1994. Extinctions in the fossil record (and discussion). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B. 344, 11-17.
  14. a b Alroy, J. (1999). "The fossil record of North American Mammals: evidence for a Palaeocene evolutionary radiation." Systematic Biology 48(1): 107-118.
  15. a b Feduccia, A. (1995). "Explosive evolution in Tertiary birds and mammals." Science 267: 637-638.
  16. a b Friedman, M. (2010). "Explosive morphological diversification of spiny-finned teleost fishes in the aftermath of the end-Cretaceous extinction." Proceedings of the Royal Society B 277: 1675-1683.
  17. Jablonski, D. (1994). "Extinctions in the fossil record (and discussion)." Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B. 344(1307): 11-17.
  18. Weishampel, D. B., P. M. Barrett, et al. (2004). Dinosaur Distribution. The Dinosauria. D. B. Weishampel, P. Dodson and H. Osmolska. Berkeley, University of California Press: 517-606.
  19. a b Szablon:Cite journal
  20. Szablon:Cite journal
  21. a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q Szablon:Cite journal
  22. a b Szablon:Cite journal
  23. Szablon:Cite journal
  24. Szablon:Cite journal
  25. Szablon:Cite journal
  26. Szablon:Cite journal
  27. Szablon:Cite journal
  28. Szablon:Cite journal
  29. Szablon:Cite journal
  30. Szablon:Cite book
  31. Szablon:Cite journal
  32. Szablon:Cite journal
  33. Szablon:Cite book
  34. a b Szablon:Cite journal
  35. Szablon:Cite journal
  36. Szablon:Cite journal
  37. Szablon:Cite book
  38. Szablon:Cite journal
  39. Szablon:Cite journal
  40. Szablon:Cite journal
  41. Szablon:Cite journal
  42. Szablon:Cite journal
  43. Szablon:Cite journal
  44. Szablon:Cite journal
  45. Szablon:Cite journal
  46. Szablon:Cite book
  47. Szablon:Cite journal
  48. a b c d e f g Szablon:Cite journal
  49. a b Szablon:Cite journal
  50. Szablon:Cite journal
  51. a b Szablon:Cite journal
  52. Wilf, P. and K. R. Johnson (2004). "Land plant extinction at the end of the Cretaceous: a quantitative analysis of the North Dakota megafloral record." Paleobiology 30(3): 347-368.
  53. Szablon:Cite book
  54. Szablon:Cite book
  55. Szablon:Cite journal
  56. Szablon:Cite journal
  57. Szablon:Cite doi
  58. Szablon:Cite journal
  59. Estes, R. (1964). "Fossil vertebrates from the Late Cretaceous Lance Formation, Eastern Wyoming." University of California Publications, Department of Geological Sciences 49: 1-180.
  60. Gardner, J. D. (2000). "Albanerpetontid amphibians from the Upper Cretaceous (Campanian and Maastrichtian) of North America." Geodiversitas 22(3): 349-388.
  61. Sheehan, P. M. and D. E. Fastovsky (1992). "Major extinctions of land-dwelling vertebrates at the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary, Eastern Montana." Geology 20: 556-560.
  62. a b Szablon:Cite journal
  63. Szablon:Cite book
  64. Szablon:Cite journal
  65. Szablon:Cite journal
  66. Szablon:Cite journal
  67. Szablon:Cite journal
  68. Szablon:Cite journal
  69. Szablon:Citation
  70. Szablon:Cite journal
  71. Szablon:Cite journal
  72. Szablon:Citation
  73. Szablon:Citation
  74. Szablon:Citation
  75. Szablon:Citation
  76. Szablon:Cite journal
  77. Szablon:Cite journal
  78. a b c Szablon:Cite journal
  79. Szablon:Cite web
  80. a b c d e Szablon:Cite book
  81. a b Szablon:Cite book
  82. Szablon:Cite journal
  83. Loeuff Le , J.(2012) Paleobiogeography and biodiversity of Late Maastrichtian dinosaurs: how many dinosaur species went extinct at the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary? Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France 183(6): 547-559 doi: 10.2113/gssgfbull.183.6.547
  84. Szablon:Cite journal
  85. Szablon:Cite journal
  86. Szablon:Cite journal
  87. Szablon:Cite journal
  88. Szablon:Cite journal
  89. Szablon:Cite journal
  90. Szablon:Cite book
  91. a b Szablon:Cite journal
  92. a b Szablon:Cite journal
  93. Szablon:Cite book
  94. Szablon:Cite web
  95. Szablon:Cite book
  96. a b c Szablon:Cite journal
  97. a b c Szablon:Cite journal
  98. Szablon:Cite book
  99. Szablon:Cite journal
  100. Szablon:Cite journal
  101. Szablon:Cite journal
  102. Szablon:Cite book
  103. Szablon:Cite journal
  104. Smit, J. and J. Klaver (1981). "Sanidine spherules at the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary indicate a large impact event." Nature 292: 47-49.
  105. Bohor, B. F., E. E. Foord, et al. (1984). "Mineralogic evidence for an impact event at the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary." Science 867: 869.
  106. Bohor, B. F., P. J. Modreski, et al. (1987). "Shocked Quartz in the Cretaceous-Tertiary Boundary Clays: Evidence for a Global Distribution." Science 236(4802): 705-709.
  107. Bourgeois, J., T. A. Hansen, et al. (1988). "A tsunami deposit at the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary in Texas." Science 241(4865): 567-570.
  108. Szablon:Cite journal
  109. Szablon:Cite journal
  110. Szablon:Cite journal
  111. a b Szablon:Cite journal
  112. Szablon:Cite news
  113. David Perlman, "Dinosaur extinction battle flares," accessed 2013-02-08
  114. Robertson, D.S., Lewis, W.M., Sheehan, P.M. & Toon, O.B. (2013) K/Pg Extinction: Re-evaluation of the Heat/Fire Hypothesis.Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences
  115. Szablon:Cite journal
  116. Szablon:Cite journal
  117. Szablon:Cite journal
  118. Szablon:Cite journal
  119. Szablon:Cite journal
  120. Szablon:Cite journal
  121. Szablon:Cite journal
  122. Szablon:Cite book
  123. Szablon:Cite journal
  124. Szablon:Cite journal
  125. Szablon:Cite journal
  126. Szablon:Cite book
  127. Szablon:Cite journal
  128. Szablon:Cite journal
  129. Szablon:Cite journal
  130. Szablon:Cite book